Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGIIX vs RWMFX
HGIIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HGIIX vs RWMFX
HGIIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGIIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGIIX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HGIIX (11.3B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HGIIX: RWMFX (1.41) vs HGIIX (0.45). HGIIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HGIIX (11 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). HGIIX (0.47) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). HGIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGIIX: RWMFX (250) vs HGIIX (2000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. HGIIX (0.07). RWMFX (27.39) and HGIIX (27.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HGIIX | RWMFX | HGIIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.31 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.31 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.572 | 4.508 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 218B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.41 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.07 | 2.09 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.16 | 30.24 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.08 | 27.39 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 161.70 | 82.36 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers