Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGIIX vs RWMFX
HGIIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HGIIX vs RWMFX
HGIIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGIIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGIIX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HGIIX (11.5B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HGIIX: RWMFX (1.40) vs HGIIX (0.46). HGIIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HGIIX (11 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). HGIIX (0.47) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). HGIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGIIX: RWMFX (250) vs HGIIX (2000). HGIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.68 vs. RWMFX (7.03). HGIIX return over 5 years is better than : 32.98 vs. RWMFX (26.38).
| HGIIX | RWMFX | HGIIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.31 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.31 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.574 | 1.322 | 573% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 218B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.40 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.68 | 7.03 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.94 | 30.20 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.98 | 26.38 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.08 | 82.33 | 203% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement