Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGISX vs RWMFX
HGISX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HGISX vs RWMFX
HGISX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGISX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGISX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HGISX (11.5B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HGISX: RWMFX (1.40) vs HGISX (0.18). HGISX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HGISX (20 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). HGISX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). HGISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). HGISX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: HGISX (0) vs RWMFX (250). HGISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.80 vs. RWMFX (8.15). HGISX return over 5 years is better than : 32.32 vs. RWMFX (27.55).
| HGISX | RWMFX | HGISX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.31 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.31 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.425 | 1.616 | 459% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 218B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 1.40 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.80 | 8.15 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.80 | 30.58 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.32 | 27.55 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 164.61 | 82.86 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement