Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGISX vs RWMFX
HGISX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HGISX vs RWMFX
HGISX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGISX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGISX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HGISX (11.4B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HGISX: RWMFX (1.41) vs HGISX (0.18). HGISX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HGISX (20 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). HGISX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). HGISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). HGISX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: HGISX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. HGISX (0.17). RWMFX (27.39) and HGISX (26.45) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HGISX | RWMFX | HGISX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.31 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.31 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.364 | 4.508 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 218B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 1.41 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.17 | 2.09 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.97 | 30.24 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.45 | 27.39 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.24 | 82.36 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement