Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGOCX vs RGABX
HGOCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts HGOCX vs RGABX
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$66.31
Change-$0.38 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.9B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.03
Change-$0.37 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
HGOCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGOCX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGOCX is a StrongBuy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. HGOCX (6.9B). HGOCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . HGOCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: HGOCX (24 years) vs RGABX (23 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: RGABX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). HGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.25 vs. RGABX (14.87). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 39.89 vs. HGOCX (-35.80).
| HGOCX | RGABX | HGOCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.39 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.39 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.919 | 17.480 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.9B | 340B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.25 | 14.87 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 112.66 | 56.56 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.80 | 39.89 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.19 | 87.35 | -48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers