Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXAX vs RLLGX
HGXAX vs RLLGX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs RLLGX
HGXAX vs RLLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. RLLGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a Hold and RLLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLLGX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. HGXAX (347M). RLLGX pays higher dividends than HGXAX: RLLGX (0.88) vs HGXAX (0.20). HGXAX was incepted earlier than RLLGX: HGXAX (10 years) vs RLLGX (17 years). HGXAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RLLGX (0.65). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RLLGX (41.00). RLLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: RLLGX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). RLLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. HGXAX (7.79). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.96 vs. RLLGX (-7.42).
| HGXAX | RLLGX | HGXAX / RLLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.65 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.65 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.715 | 12.570 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 347M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.88 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.79 | 9.55 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.33 | 39.24 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.96 | -7.42 | -148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement