Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXAX vs SCWCX
HGXAX vs SCWCX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs SCWCX
HGXAX vs SCWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. SCWCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a Buy and SCWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWCX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. HGXAX (358M). HGXAX pays higher dividends than SCWCX: HGXAX (0.20) vs SCWCX (0.12). HGXAX was incepted earlier than SCWCX: HGXAX (9 years) vs SCWCX (25 years). SCWCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than HGXAX (1.19). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SCWCX (41.00). SCWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: SCWCX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). HGXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.65 vs. SCWCX (10.87). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.24 vs. SCWCX (-12.74).
| HGXAX | SCWCX | HGXAX / SCWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.77 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.77 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.320 | 9.871 | 145% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 358M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.12 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.65 | 10.87 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.39 | 23.51 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.24 | -12.74 | -120% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement