Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXAX vs SCWFX
HGXAX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs SCWFX
HGXAX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. HGXAX (357M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than HGXAX: SCWFX (0.59) vs HGXAX (0.21). HGXAX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: HGXAX (9 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). HGXAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: SCWFX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.28 vs. HGXAX (15.93). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.33 vs. SCWFX (-0.40).
| HGXAX | SCWFX | HGXAX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.775 | 15.825 | 81% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.59 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.93 | 22.28 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.88 | 36.02 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.33 | -0.40 | -4,380% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers