Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXFX vs RSLAX
HGXFX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts HGXFX vs RSLAX
HGXFX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXFX vs. RSLAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXFX is a Buy and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 88.9B vs. HGXFX (359M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: HGXFX (0.66) vs RSLAX (0.21). HGXFX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: HGXFX (9 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than HGXFX (0.74). HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXFX: RSLAX (250) vs HGXFX (1000000). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.70 vs. HGXFX (16.58). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.69 vs. RSLAX (-8.40).
| HGXFX | RSLAX | HGXFX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.74 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.74 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.449 | 11.740 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 359M | 88.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.21 | 320% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | 18.70 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.49 | 33.39 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.69 | -8.40 | -246% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement