Ad is loading...
HGXFX vs RSLDX
HGXFX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts HGXFX vs RSLDX
Hartford Global Impact F
Price$15.05
Change+$0.20 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.74M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$63.18
Change+$0.72 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.16B
HGXFX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXFX vs. RSLDX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXFX is a Buy and RSLDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 67.2B vs. HGXFX (248M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: HGXFX (1.20) vs RSLDX (0.89). HGXFX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: HGXFX (8 years) vs RSLDX (9 years). RSLDX (0.80) and HGXFX (0.77) have similar cost to investors . HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXFX: RSLDX (250) vs HGXFX (1000000). HGXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.48 vs. RSLDX (-4.59). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 62.78 vs. RSLDX (25.93).
| HGXFX | RSLDX | HGXFX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.80 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.80 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.257 | -8.268 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 248M | 67.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.89 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | -4.59 | -141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.72 | -0.40 | -1,915% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.78 | 25.93 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...