Ad is loading...
HGXFX vs RSLDX
HGXFX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts HGXFX vs RSLDX
Hartford Global Impact F
Price$14.97
Change-$0.47 (-3.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.04M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$61.74
Change-$2.94 (-4.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.74B
HGXFX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXFX vs. RSLDX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXFX is a Buy and RSLDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 69.7B vs. HGXFX (257M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: HGXFX (1.20) vs RSLDX (0.89). HGXFX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: HGXFX (8 years) vs RSLDX (9 years). RSLDX (0.80) and HGXFX (0.77) have similar cost to investors . HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXFX: RSLDX (250) vs HGXFX (1000000). HGXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.14 vs. RSLDX (-4.87). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.54 vs. RSLDX (52.36).
| HGXFX | RSLDX | HGXFX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.80 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.80 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.586 | -5.008 | -12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 257M | 69.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.89 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.14 | -4.87 | -147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.25 | -5.58 | -76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.54 | 52.36 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...