Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXFX vs SFCWX
HGXFX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts HGXFX vs SFCWX
Hartford Global Impact F
Price$16.92
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.05M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$74.47
Change+$0.19 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.52B
HGXFX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXFX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXFX is a StrongBuy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 78.5B vs. HGXFX (294M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: HGXFX (1.08) vs SFCWX (0.94). HGXFX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: HGXFX (8 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). HGXFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). HGXFX (1000000) and SFCWX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HGXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.12 vs. SFCWX (11.02). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.35 vs. SFCWX (23.08).
| HGXFX | SFCWX | HGXFX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.65 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.65 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.033 | 8.166 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 294M | 78.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.94 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.12 | 11.02 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.80 | 35.36 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.35 | 23.08 | 240% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement