Ad is loading...
HGXFX vs SFCWX
HGXFX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts HGXFX vs SFCWX
Hartford Global Impact F
Price$15.05
Change+$0.20 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.74M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$63.93
Change+$0.73 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.16B
HGXFX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXFX vs. SFCWX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXFX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 67.2B vs. HGXFX (248M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: HGXFX (1.20) vs SFCWX (1.04). HGXFX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: HGXFX (8 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). HGXFX (0.77) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). HGXFX (1000000) and SFCWX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HGXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.48 vs. SFCWX (-4.44). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 62.78 vs. SFCWX (26.81).
| HGXFX | SFCWX | HGXFX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.65 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.65 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.257 | -8.233 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 248M | 67.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.04 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | -4.44 | -146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.72 | -0.10 | -7,890% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.78 | 26.81 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers