Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RLLGX
HGXIX vs RLLGX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RLLGX
HGXIX vs RLLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RLLGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Buy and RLLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLLGX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. HGXIX (359M). RLLGX pays higher dividends than HGXIX: RLLGX (0.91) vs HGXIX (0.48). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RLLGX: HGXIX (9 years) vs RLLGX (17 years). HGXIX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RLLGX (0.65). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RLLGX (41.00). RLLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RLLGX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). RLLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.49 vs. HGXIX (16.47). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 17.31 vs. RLLGX (1.05).
| HGXIX | RLLGX | HGXIX / RLLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.65 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.65 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.880 | 17.040 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 359M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.91 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.47 | 24.49 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.33 | 44.66 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.31 | 1.05 | 1,651% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement