Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RSLAX
HGXIX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSLAX
HGXIX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSLAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Buy and RSLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. HGXIX (359M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: HGXIX (0.48) vs RSLAX (0.21). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: HGXIX (9 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.88). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSLAX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.98 vs. HGXIX (16.47). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 17.31 vs. RSLAX (-6.60).
| HGXIX | RSLAX | HGXIX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.74 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.74 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.880 | 16.432 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 359M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.21 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.47 | 21.98 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.33 | 38.67 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.31 | -6.60 | -262% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement