Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXSX vs RSLFX
HGXSX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts HGXSX vs RSLFX
Hartford Global Impact R4
Price$17.39
Change-$0.11 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets330.06M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$78.98
Change-$0.85 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.2B
HGXSX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXSX vs. RSLFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXSX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 82.2B vs. HGXSX (330M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than HGXSX: RSLFX (0.83) vs HGXSX (0.67). HGXSX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: HGXSX (9 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). HGXSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). HGXSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLFX (32.00). HGXSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLFX: HGXSX (0) vs RSLFX (250). HGXSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.02 vs. RSLFX (8.98). HGXSX return over 5 years is better than : 33.08 vs. RSLFX (11.98).
| HGXSX | RSLFX | HGXSX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.70 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.70 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.636 | 11.606 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330M | 82.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.83 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.02 | 8.98 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.62 | 44.09 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.08 | 11.98 | 276% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers