Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXSX vs RSLFX
HGXSX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts HGXSX vs RSLFX
Hartford Global Impact R4
Price$16.78
Change+$0.14 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.71M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$76.85
Change+$0.80 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.16B
HGXSX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXSX vs. RSLFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXSX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. HGXSX (293M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than HGXSX: RSLFX (0.86) vs HGXSX (0.69). HGXSX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: HGXSX (8 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). HGXSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). HGXSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLFX (32.00). HGXSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLFX: HGXSX (0) vs RSLFX (250). HGXSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.22 vs. RSLFX (6.23). HGXSX return over 5 years is better than : 45.84 vs. RSLFX (20.96).
| HGXSX | RSLFX | HGXSX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.70 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.70 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.052 | 8.597 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 78.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.86 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 6.23 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.19 | 35.52 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.84 | 20.96 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement