Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXSX vs RSLFX
HGXSX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts HGXSX vs RSLFX
HGXSX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXSX vs. RSLFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXSX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. HGXSX (347M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than HGXSX: RSLFX (0.81) vs HGXSX (0.27). HGXSX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: HGXSX (10 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). HGXSX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). HGXSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RSLFX (41.00). HGXSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLFX: HGXSX (0) vs RSLFX (250). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. HGXSX (7.84). HGXSX return over 5 years is better than : 11.31 vs. RSLFX (-7.47).
| HGXSX | RSLFX | HGXSX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.70 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.70 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.753 | 12.524 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 347M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.81 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | 9.55 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.65 | 39.09 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.31 | -7.47 | -151% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement