Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXSX vs RSLFX
HGXSX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts HGXSX vs RSLFX
HGXSX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXSX vs. RSLFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXSX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. HGXSX (359M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than HGXSX: RSLFX (0.84) vs HGXSX (0.28). HGXSX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: HGXSX (9 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). HGXSX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). HGXSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RSLFX (41.00). HGXSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLFX: HGXSX (0) vs RSLFX (250). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.47 vs. HGXSX (16.21). HGXSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.95 vs. RSLFX (1.00).
| HGXSX | RSLFX | HGXSX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.70 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.70 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.813 | 17.006 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 359M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.84 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.21 | 24.47 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.25 | 44.49 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.95 | 1.00 | 1,601% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement