Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXVX vs SCWFX
HGXVX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts HGXVX vs SCWFX
HGXVX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXVX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXVX is a Buy and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. HGXVX (359M). HGXVX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: HGXVX (0.66) vs SCWFX (0.59). HGXVX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: HGXVX (9 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). SCWFX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HGXVX (0.74). HGXVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). HGXVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCWFX: HGXVX (0) vs SCWFX (250). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.69 vs. HGXVX (16.80). HGXVX return over 5 years is better than : 18.46 vs. SCWFX (-1.41).
| HGXVX | SCWFX | HGXVX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.07 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.072 | 16.796 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 359M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.59 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.80 | 23.69 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.11 | 42.49 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.46 | -1.41 | -1,310% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement