Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXYX vs SCWFX
HGXYX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts HGXYX vs SCWFX
HGXYX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXYX vs. SCWFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXYX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. HGXYX (343M). SCWFX (0.56) and HGXYX (0.56) have matching dividends . HGXYX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: HGXYX (10 years) vs SCWFX (26 years). SCWFX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HGXYX (0.84). HGXYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXYX: SCWFX (250) vs HGXYX (250000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.85 vs. HGXYX (8.18). HGXYX return over 5 years is better than : 13.07 vs. SCWFX (-9.66).
| HGXYX | SCWFX | HGXYX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.913 | 12.243 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.56 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.18 | 8.85 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.09 | 37.17 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.07 | -9.66 | -135% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement