Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXYX vs SCWFX
HGXYX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts HGXYX vs SCWFX
HGXYX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXYX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXYX is a Buy and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. HGXYX (359M). SCWFX (0.59) and HGXYX (0.57) have matching dividends . HGXYX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: HGXYX (9 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). SCWFX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HGXYX (0.84). HGXYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXYX: SCWFX (250) vs HGXYX (250000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.69 vs. HGXYX (16.64). HGXYX return over 5 years is better than : 17.89 vs. SCWFX (-1.41).
| HGXYX | SCWFX | HGXYX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.973 | 16.796 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 359M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.59 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.64 | 23.69 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.75 | 42.49 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.89 | -1.41 | -1,270% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement