Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHDVX vs RMFCX
HHDVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HHDVX vs RMFCX
HHDVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHDVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHDVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. HHDVX (1.79B). HHDVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HHDVX (1.71) vs RMFCX (1.19). HHDVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HHDVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HHDVX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. HHDVX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHDVX: RMFCX (250) vs HHDVX (2500). HHDVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.17 vs. RMFCX (10.10). HHDVX return over 5 years is better than : 46.52 vs. RMFCX (33.85).
| HHDVX | RMFCX | HHDVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.823 | 5.845 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 115B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.19 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.17 | 10.10 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.24 | 34.65 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.52 | 33.85 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.86 | 91.46 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers