Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHDVX vs RMFCX
HHDVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HHDVX vs RMFCX
HHDVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHDVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHDVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HHDVX (1.86B). HHDVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HHDVX (1.95) vs RMFCX (1.15). HHDVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HHDVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HHDVX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. HHDVX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHDVX: RMFCX (250) vs HHDVX (2500). HHDVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.94 vs. RMFCX (9.80). HHDVX return over 5 years is better than : 53.17 vs. RMFCX (37.68).
| HHDVX | RMFCX | HHDVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.415 | 11.616 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 1.15 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.94 | 9.80 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.83 | 38.60 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.17 | 37.68 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.26 | 94.87 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement