Ad is loading...
HHHSX vs RNWHX
HHHSX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts HHHSX vs RNWHX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq R4
Price$17.62
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.42B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$80.42
Change+$0.18 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.55B
HHHSX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHHSX vs. RNWHX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHHSX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 63.6B vs. HHHSX (5.42B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than HHHSX: RNWHX (1.10) vs HHHSX (0.89). HHHSX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: HHHSX (9 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). HHHSX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). HHHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). HHHSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: HHHSX (0) vs RNWHX (250). HHHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.46 vs. RNWHX (3.35). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 37.43 vs. HHHSX (33.02).
| HHHSX | RNWHX | HHHSX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.695 | 5.788 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.42B | 63.6B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.10 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.46 | 3.35 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.34 | 27.01 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.02 | 37.43 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers