Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHHSX vs RNWHX
HHHSX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts HHHSX vs RNWHX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq R4
Price$19.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$87.64
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.85B
HHHSX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHHSX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHHSX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 69.8B vs. HHHSX (5.73B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than HHHSX: RNWHX (1.04) vs HHHSX (0.85). HHHSX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: HHHSX (9 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). HHHSX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). HHHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). HHHSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: HHHSX (0) vs RNWHX (250). HHHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.87 vs. RNWHX (11.44). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 35.41 vs. HHHSX (32.39).
| HHHSX | RNWHX | HHHSX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.808 | 15.285 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.73B | 69.8B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.04 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.87 | 11.44 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.61 | 37.22 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.39 | 35.41 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement