Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HIADX vs RMFCX
HIADX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HIADX vs RMFCX
HIADX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HIADX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIADX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HIADX (3.51B). HIADX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HIADX (1.24) vs RMFCX (1.16). HIADX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HIADX (32 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HIADX (0.66). HIADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). HIADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HIADX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.09 vs. HIADX (6.94). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. HIADX (4.85).
| HIADX | RMFCX | HIADX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.91 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.91 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.593 | 9.496 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.16 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.94 | 9.09 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.13 | 33.16 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.85 | 37.08 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.55 | 92.36 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement