Exchange-traded funds such as HIBL and QLD attract investors seeking amplified equity exposure within technology and growth segments of the U.S. market. These products do not compete directly; instead, they represent distinct leveraged strategies that target overlapping yet differentiated segments of the equity universe. HIBL emphasizes high-beta constituents within the broad S&P 500, while QLD magnifies the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. In the current environment of rapid technological advancement and sector rotation, both vehicles illustrate how leverage can magnify returns and risks tied to growth equities.
HIBL is a leveraged exchange-traded fund that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500 High Beta Index. The underlying index selects the 100 stocks from the S&P 500 with the highest historical beta over the preceding 12 months and weights them accordingly. The fund typically holds approximately 100–110 positions, though the majority of exposure is achieved through total return swaps rather than direct equity ownership. Top holdings often include high-beta technology and cyclical names such as Micron Technology, Advanced Micro Devices, and Dell Technologies. Sector allocations are concentrated in information technology (approximately 47%), followed by industrials, financials, and consumer discretionary. The net expense ratio stands at 0.98%. As a daily-reset 3x product, HIBL is designed for short-term tactical use and employs synthetic replication.
QLD is a leveraged exchange-traded fund that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The Nasdaq-100 comprises the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange, with heavy representation from technology and growth sectors. The fund maintains roughly 110–130 holdings, with the bulk of exposure obtained via swaps on the index and the underlying exchange-traded fund. Prominent holdings typically feature mega-cap leaders including NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector weights are dominated by information technology (approximately 59%), communication services, and consumer discretionary. The net expense ratio is 0.95%. Like other daily-reset leveraged products, QLD utilizes derivatives for its 2x target and is intended for short-term trading strategies.
Both ETFs operate within the broader U.S. equity growth and technology ecosystem, where innovation in semiconductors, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence continues to drive capital allocation. Macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate expectations, corporate earnings cycles in the technology sector, and regulatory developments affecting large technology platforms influence performance dynamics. Capital flows into growth equities have remained resilient amid ongoing digital transformation, although elevated valuations and potential shifts in monetary policy introduce volatility. Sector risks include concentration in a handful of mega-cap names, supply-chain disruptions in technology hardware, and competitive pressures within software and internet services. These environmental factors affect the relative positioning of high-beta and broad growth indices alike.
In recent market cycles, both leveraged ETFs have delivered amplified returns during periods of broad equity gains while experiencing pronounced drawdowns during market stress, consistent with their daily-reset structures. HIBL’s emphasis on the highest-beta S&P 500 constituents has produced greater sensitivity to market swings and sector rotations favoring cyclical and smaller-cap growth names within technology. QLD, by contrast, has benefited from sustained momentum in Nasdaq-100 mega-caps, offering relatively more stable (though still elevated) volatility compared with the 3x high-beta vehicle. Relative positioning reflects differing leverage levels and underlying index characteristics: HIBL provides sharper exposure to beta-driven moves, whereas QLD aligns more closely with established large-cap technology leadership.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.
Based on observable structural factors, QLD currently presents a marginally more balanced profile for investors seeking leveraged growth exposure. Its lower leverage multiple, slightly lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the Nasdaq-100, and established liquidity profile contribute to more consistent trend participation with comparatively moderated volatility relative to HIBL. HIBL offers higher-beta amplification suited to short-term tactical views on market leadership rotation but carries elevated structural risk from its 3x multiplier and narrower high-beta selection universe. The AI assessment favors QLD for most positioning scenarios given the combination of cost efficiency, diversification, and sector momentum alignment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| HIBL | QLD | HIBL / QLD | |
| Gain YTD | 61.227 | 27.295 | 224% |
| Net Assets | 76.2M | 13.9B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.95 | 103% |
| Turnover | 165.00 | 23.00 | 717% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 0.13 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 20 years | - |
| HIBL | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIBL has been closely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIBL jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIBL | 100% | +6.53% | ||
| BLK - HIBL | 73% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| TEL - HIBL | 72% Closely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| ETN - HIBL | 72% Closely correlated | +3.96% | ||
| CAT - HIBL | 70% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| FBIN - HIBL | 70% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been loosely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | +1.74% | ||
| SWKS - QLD | 61% Loosely correlated | +5.14% | ||
| ZM - QLD | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| DOCU - QLD | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| ALGN - QLD | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| OKTA - QLD | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.69% | ||
More | ||||