HIBL
Price
$105.82
Change
+$6.49 (+6.53%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
76.18M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QLD
Price
$89.55
Change
+$1.53 (+1.74%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
13.86B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HIBL vs QLD

HIBL vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) vs. ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD)

Key Takeaways

  • HIBL offers 3x daily leveraged exposure to the S&P 500 High Beta Index, which selects the 100 highest-beta stocks from the S&P 500, resulting in concentrated high-volatility equity exposure.
  • QLD provides 2x daily leveraged exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index, delivering amplified returns from a broad basket of large-cap growth and technology companies.
  • Both ETFs employ daily-reset leveraged structures using derivatives such as swaps, making them tactical tools rather than long-term buy-and-hold investments due to compounding effects over multiple days.
  • HIBL carries a net expense ratio of 0.98% and typically exhibits higher volatility given its focus on the highest-beta names, while QLD has a slightly lower net expense ratio of 0.95%.
  • Sector allocations in both favor technology and growth-oriented areas, but HIBL tilts toward higher-beta cyclical and tech names, whereas QLD emphasizes mega-cap leaders in information technology and communication services.
  • Investors comparing the two should weigh the trade-off between HIBL’s higher leverage and beta sensitivity versus QLD’s more established liquidity and broader Nasdaq-100 diversification.

Introduction

Exchange-traded funds such as HIBL and QLD attract investors seeking amplified equity exposure within technology and growth segments of the U.S. market. These products do not compete directly; instead, they represent distinct leveraged strategies that target overlapping yet differentiated segments of the equity universe. HIBL emphasizes high-beta constituents within the broad S&P 500, while QLD magnifies the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. In the current environment of rapid technological advancement and sector rotation, both vehicles illustrate how leverage can magnify returns and risks tied to growth equities.

Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) Overview

HIBL is a leveraged exchange-traded fund that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500 High Beta Index. The underlying index selects the 100 stocks from the S&P 500 with the highest historical beta over the preceding 12 months and weights them accordingly. The fund typically holds approximately 100–110 positions, though the majority of exposure is achieved through total return swaps rather than direct equity ownership. Top holdings often include high-beta technology and cyclical names such as Micron Technology, Advanced Micro Devices, and Dell Technologies. Sector allocations are concentrated in information technology (approximately 47%), followed by industrials, financials, and consumer discretionary. The net expense ratio stands at 0.98%. As a daily-reset 3x product, HIBL is designed for short-term tactical use and employs synthetic replication.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

QLD is a leveraged exchange-traded fund that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The Nasdaq-100 comprises the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange, with heavy representation from technology and growth sectors. The fund maintains roughly 110–130 holdings, with the bulk of exposure obtained via swaps on the index and the underlying exchange-traded fund. Prominent holdings typically feature mega-cap leaders including NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector weights are dominated by information technology (approximately 59%), communication services, and consumer discretionary. The net expense ratio is 0.95%. Like other daily-reset leveraged products, QLD utilizes derivatives for its 2x target and is intended for short-term trading strategies.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the broader U.S. equity growth and technology ecosystem, where innovation in semiconductors, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence continues to drive capital allocation. Macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate expectations, corporate earnings cycles in the technology sector, and regulatory developments affecting large technology platforms influence performance dynamics. Capital flows into growth equities have remained resilient amid ongoing digital transformation, although elevated valuations and potential shifts in monetary policy introduce volatility. Sector risks include concentration in a handful of mega-cap names, supply-chain disruptions in technology hardware, and competitive pressures within software and internet services. These environmental factors affect the relative positioning of high-beta and broad growth indices alike.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both leveraged ETFs have delivered amplified returns during periods of broad equity gains while experiencing pronounced drawdowns during market stress, consistent with their daily-reset structures. HIBL’s emphasis on the highest-beta S&P 500 constituents has produced greater sensitivity to market swings and sector rotations favoring cyclical and smaller-cap growth names within technology. QLD, by contrast, has benefited from sustained momentum in Nasdaq-100 mega-caps, offering relatively more stable (though still elevated) volatility compared with the 3x high-beta vehicle. Relative positioning reflects differing leverage levels and underlying index characteristics: HIBL provides sharper exposure to beta-driven moves, whereas QLD aligns more closely with established large-cap technology leadership.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, QLD currently presents a marginally more balanced profile for investors seeking leveraged growth exposure. Its lower leverage multiple, slightly lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the Nasdaq-100, and established liquidity profile contribute to more consistent trend participation with comparatively moderated volatility relative to HIBL. HIBL offers higher-beta amplification suited to short-term tactical views on market leadership rotation but carries elevated structural risk from its 3x multiplier and narrower high-beta selection universe. The AI assessment favors QLD for most positioning scenarios given the combination of cost efficiency, diversification, and sector momentum alignment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
HIBL vs. QLD commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIBL is a Hold and QLD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 13.9B vs. HIBL (76.2M). HIBL has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: HIBL (61.227) vs QLD (27.295). HIBL was incepted earlier than QLD: HIBL (7 years) vs QLD (20 years). QLD (0.95) and HIBL (0.98) have comparable expense ratios . HIBL has a higher turnover QLD (23.00) vs QLD (23.00).
HIBLQLDHIBL / QLD
Gain YTD61.22727.295224%
Net Assets76.2M13.9B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.980.95103%
Turnover165.0023.00717%
Yield0.070.1355%
Fund Existence7 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HIBLQLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
HIBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSIX42.111.82
+4.52%
Power Solutions International Inc
DK76.101.21
+1.62%
Delek US Holdings
AMP557.614.08
+0.74%
Ameriprise Financial
LARK32.500.02
+0.06%
Landmark Bancorp Inc.
ATER0.77-0.08
-9.81%
Aterian

HIBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIBL has been closely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIBL jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIBL
1D Price
Change %
HIBL100%
+6.53%
BLK - HIBL
73%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
TEL - HIBL
72%
Closely correlated
+3.58%
ETN - HIBL
72%
Closely correlated
+3.96%
CAT - HIBL
70%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
FBIN - HIBL
70%
Closely correlated
+2.49%
More

QLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been loosely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLD
1D Price
Change %
QLD100%
+1.74%
SWKS - QLD
61%
Loosely correlated
+5.14%
ZM - QLD
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
DOCU - QLD
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
ALGN - QLD
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
OKTA - QLD
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
More