HIBL
Price
$115.58
Change
-$0.11 (-0.10%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Net Assets
93.9M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPXL
Price
$279.19
Change
+$3.40 (+1.23%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
7.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HIBL vs SPXL

HIBL vs SPXL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) vs. Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL)

Key Takeaways

  • HIBL targets 300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500 High Beta Index, offering leveraged exposure to the most volatile large-cap stocks, while SPXL seeks 300% of the daily performance of the broad S&P 500 Index.
  • Both ETFs employ daily-reset leveraged structures, resulting in compounding effects over longer periods and heightened sensitivity to market volatility compared with unleveraged equity funds.
  • HIBL maintains a concentrated portfolio of approximately 100 holdings focused on high-beta names, whereas SPXL provides broad diversification across roughly 500 holdings mirroring the full S&P 500.
  • Expense ratios differ modestly, with HIBL at 0.98% and SPXL at 0.84%, reflecting the incremental costs associated with high-beta index replication.
  • Sector exposure in HIBL tilts toward cyclical and growth-oriented areas such as technology and consumer discretionary, amplifying potential returns and drawdowns relative to SPXL’s market-cap-weighted profile.
  • Both products suit sophisticated investors comfortable with daily rebalancing mechanics and elevated risk, but they diverge significantly in volatility profiles and thematic emphasis.

Introduction

Investors seeking amplified daily exposure to U.S. large-cap equities often evaluate leveraged products that track variations of the S&P 500. HIBL and SPXL, both issued by Direxion, deliver 3x daily bull exposure yet differ in underlying index construction. HIBL emphasizes high-beta constituents, while SPXL replicates the standard S&P 500. These structural distinctions create distinct risk-return profiles within the same leveraged equity category, making the pair relevant for investors evaluating volatility targeting or sector rotation strategies in the current market environment.

Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) Overview

HIBL is a leveraged exchange-traded fund that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the S&P 500 High Beta Index. The fund holds approximately 100–113 securities selected for elevated historical beta relative to the broader market. Top holdings typically include names such as Coinbase Global, Dell Technologies, APA Corporation, Robinhood Markets, and Palantir Technologies. Sector allocations favor technology, consumer discretionary, and industrials. The net expense ratio stands at 0.98%. As a passive, daily-reset leveraged product, HIBL rebalances each trading day to maintain the 3x target, introducing path dependency and higher volatility than unleveraged alternatives.

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) Overview

SPXL is a leveraged exchange-traded fund designed to deliver daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the S&P 500 Index. The fund maintains exposure to approximately 500–523 holdings that mirror the composition of the broad large-cap benchmark. Prominent positions include Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector weights reflect standard S&P 500 allocations, with technology representing the largest component. The net expense ratio is 0.84%. Like HIBL, SPXL employs daily rebalancing to sustain its leverage target, resulting in compounding effects that can deviate from simple 3x returns over multi-day periods.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the U.S. large-cap equity space, where technology and growth-oriented sectors have influenced market leadership in recent market cycles. Macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate expectations, corporate earnings trends, and capital-flow dynamics into mega-cap technology names continue to shape performance differentials. High-beta segments tracked by HIBL tend to amplify moves during risk-on periods but can experience sharper reversals when sentiment shifts. Regulatory developments affecting technology platforms and broader monetary policy remain key variables influencing the environment surrounding these leveraged products.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, relative performance between the two ETFs has reflected differences in underlying index sensitivity. HIBL’s focus on high-beta securities has produced more pronounced swings tied to sector rotation and momentum in volatile growth names. SPXL, by contrast, has delivered returns more closely aligned with broad market movements, exhibiting comparatively lower volatility within the leveraged category. Over multiple market cycles, the high-beta emphasis in HIBL has contributed to greater dispersion during earnings seasons and shifts in risk appetite, while SPXL has provided more consistent leverage to overall S&P 500 trends.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, SPXL currently presents a marginally more favorable profile for broad leveraged market exposure due to its lower expense ratio, greater diversification across approximately 500 holdings, and alignment with the core S&P 500 benchmark. HIBL offers differentiated access to high-beta momentum but carries incrementally higher costs and concentration risk. Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a probabilistic preference to SPXL for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and market-beta consistency, while acknowledging HIBL’s utility in targeted volatility strategies.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
HIBL vs. SPXL commentary
Jul 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIBL is a Hold and SPXL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXL has more net assets: 7.07B vs. HIBL (93.9M). HIBL has a higher annual dividend yield than SPXL: HIBL (76.102) vs SPXL (27.094). HIBL was incepted earlier than SPXL: HIBL (7 years) vs SPXL (18 years). SPXL (0.84) has a lower expense ratio than HIBL (0.98). HIBL has a higher turnover SPXL (71.00) vs SPXL (71.00).
HIBLSPXLHIBL / SPXL
Gain YTD76.10227.094281%
Net Assets93.9M7.07B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.980.84117%
Turnover165.0071.00232%
Yield1.130.53215%
Fund Existence7 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HIBLSPXL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HIBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCGJX31.040.24
+0.78%
William Blair Large Cap Growth R6
PRMSX56.160.15
+0.27%
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock
CIQRX15.690.02
+0.13%
Segall Bryant & Hamll Intl Eq Retl
BAHAX17.620.02
+0.11%
Brown Advisory WMC Strat Eurp Eq Adv
VSPRX16.11N/A
N/A
Voya Small Company Port R6

HIBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIBL has been closely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIBL jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIBL
1D Price
Change %
HIBL100%
-0.09%
BLK - HIBL
73%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
MPWR - HIBL
73%
Closely correlated
-1.56%
TEL - HIBL
72%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
ETN - HIBL
71%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
ROK - HIBL
71%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
More

SPXL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPXL has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPXL jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXL
1D Price
Change %
SPXL100%
+1.23%
MSFT - SPXL
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
AAPL - SPXL
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
AMZN - SPXL
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
META - SPXL
59%
Loosely correlated
+5.97%
NVDA - SPXL
56%
Loosely correlated
+4.03%
More