HIBL
Price
$105.82
Change
+$6.49 (+6.53%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
76.18M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SSO
Price
$69.63
Change
+$1.13 (+1.65%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
8.77B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HIBL vs SSO

HIBL vs SSO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) vs. ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO)

Key Takeaways

  • Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) delivers 3x daily exposure to the highest-beta stocks within the S&P 500 (Standard & Poor's 500), while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) provides 2x daily exposure to the broad S&P 500 Index.
  • HIBL concentrates on approximately 100 high-beta securities with pronounced technology and cyclical sector weightings, whereas SSO offers diversified exposure across roughly 500 large-cap holdings mirroring the full S&P 500 sector distribution.
  • Both ETFs employ derivatives such as swaps and futures for leverage and reset daily, making them tactical tools suited for short-term market timing rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies.
  • HIBL carries a higher expense ratio of 0.98% compared with SSO's 0.87%, reflecting the added complexity of high-beta selection and greater leverage.
  • Structural differences in beta sensitivity and leverage amplify HIBL's volatility relative to SSO, positioning the former for investors seeking amplified exposure to market momentum within volatile segments.
  • SSO benefits from greater scale, tighter bid-ask spreads in normal conditions, and broader liquidity, while HIBL offers targeted access to high-sensitivity names that may outperform in strong equity uptrends.

Introduction

Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) represent distinct leveraged strategies targeting U.S. large-cap equities. They do not compete directly for identical investor mandates but instead provide alternative ways to express bullish views on equity markets. HIBL emphasizes momentum-sensitive, high-beta components of the S&P 500, while SSO magnifies returns across the entire index. In the current environment of shifting sector leadership and interest-rate expectations, these funds illustrate contrasting approaches to amplified equity exposure, allowing investors to evaluate risk-adjusted positioning based on structural characteristics rather than short-term price fluctuations.

Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) Overview

Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the S&P 500 High Beta Index. The underlying index selects the 100 stocks from the S&P 500 with the highest beta (sensitivity to market movements) over the trailing 12 months and rebalances quarterly. The fund typically holds around 100-108 positions but achieves its 3x target primarily through total return swaps and other derivatives rather than direct ownership of all index constituents. Sector allocations show heavy concentration in information technology (often exceeding 40%), followed by industrials, financials, and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio stands at 0.98%. As a passive, rules-based leveraged product, HIBL resets exposure daily and carries elevated volatility inherent to both the high-beta selection and the triple leverage multiplier.

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) Overview

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund provides leveraged exposure across the full market-capitalization-weighted index of approximately 500 large- and mid-cap U.S. companies. It typically maintains 500+ notional positions through a combination of swaps, futures, and money-market instruments. Sector allocations closely track the S&P 500, with information technology representing the largest weight (approximately 30-35%), followed by financials, communication services, and healthcare. The expense ratio is 0.87%. SSO employs a passive strategy with daily rebalancing to maintain the 2x target and benefits from the broad diversification and established liquidity profile of the underlying benchmark.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the U.S. large-cap equity market, where sector rotation, earnings growth in technology leaders, and macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate policy and corporate capital expenditure trends influence performance. High-beta segments tend to respond more sharply to risk-on sentiment, while the broad S&P 500 reflects aggregate economic conditions across defensive and cyclical industries. Regulatory developments around leveraged products and ongoing capital flows into equity exchange-traded products continue to shape the environment. Investors monitor these dynamics over recent market cycles to assess relative positioning without reliance on single-day events.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent weeks and months, HIBL's higher leverage and concentration in high-beta names have produced greater price swings than SSO during periods of equity market advances or retreats. SSO's broader exposure to the full S&P 500 has delivered more moderate amplification aligned with overall index movements. Relative positioning favors HIBL in environments where high-sensitivity stocks lead, such as strong technology-driven rallies, while SSO provides steadier participation across market segments. Volatility differences stem directly from the 3x versus 2x multiplier and the beta-weighted versus market-cap-weighted construction, influencing how each fund responds to sector rotation and macroeconomic shifts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including broader diversification, lower expense ratio, established scale, and consistent alignment with overall market momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable relative positioning to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) for most tactical allocation scenarios within the leveraged equity category.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
HIBL vs. SSO commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIBL is a Hold and SSO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSO has more net assets: 8.77B vs. HIBL (76.2M). HIBL has a higher annual dividend yield than SSO: HIBL (61.227) vs SSO (20.715). HIBL was incepted earlier than SSO: HIBL (7 years) vs SSO (20 years). SSO (0.87) has a lower expense ratio than HIBL (0.98). HIBL has a higher turnover SSO (12.00) vs SSO (12.00).
HIBLSSOHIBL / SSO
Gain YTD61.22720.715296%
Net Assets76.2M8.77B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.980.87113%
Turnover165.0012.001,375%
Yield0.070.6411%
Fund Existence7 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HIBLSSO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
HIBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSIX42.111.82
+4.52%
Power Solutions International Inc
DK76.101.21
+1.62%
Delek US Holdings
AMP557.614.08
+0.74%
Ameriprise Financial
LARK32.500.02
+0.06%
Landmark Bancorp Inc.
ATER0.77-0.08
-9.81%
Aterian

HIBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIBL has been closely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIBL jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIBL
1D Price
Change %
HIBL100%
+6.53%
BLK - HIBL
73%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
TEL - HIBL
72%
Closely correlated
+3.58%
ETN - HIBL
72%
Closely correlated
+3.96%
CAT - HIBL
70%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
FBIN - HIBL
70%
Closely correlated
+2.49%
More

SSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSO has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSO jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSO
1D Price
Change %
SSO100%
+1.65%
MSFT - SSO
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
AAPL - SSO
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
AMZN - SSO
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
NVDA - SSO
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%