Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HICGX vs NAESX
HICGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HICGX vs NAESX
HICGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HICGX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HICGX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. HICGX (465M). NAESX pays higher dividends than HICGX: NAESX (1.09) vs HICGX (0.06). HICGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HICGX (19 years) vs NAESX (66 years). HICGX (1.00) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than HICGX: NAESX (0) vs HICGX (250000). HICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. NAESX (14.03). NAESX (33.87) and HICGX (33.77) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HICGX | NAESX | HICGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.17 | 588% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.17 | 588% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.087 | 13.923 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 465M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.09 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 14.03 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.16 | 50.81 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.77 | 33.87 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.53 | 154.70 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement