HIG
Price
$136.10
Change
-$1.02 (-0.74%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
36.87B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UFCS
Price
$53.02
Change
-$0.25 (-0.47%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.36B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HIG vs UFCS

HIG vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HIG vs. UFCS commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIG is a Hold and UFCS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (HIG: $136.10 vs. UFCS: $53.02)
Brand notoriety: HIG and UFCS are both not notable
HIG represents the Multi-Line Insurance, while UFCS is part of the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HIG: 166% vs. UFCS: 146%
Market capitalization -- HIG: $36.87B vs. UFCS: $1.36B
HIG [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $36.87B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $131.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $18.54B. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $13.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HIG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HIG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UFCS is a better buy in the long-term than HIG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HIG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HIG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIG is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

HIG (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -1.39% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -2.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.32%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

HIG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.54% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.15% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIG($36.9B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($1.36B). UFCS (9.84) and HIG (9.40) have similar P/E ratio . UFCS YTD gains are higher at: 47.303 vs. HIG (-0.341). HIG has more cash in the bank: 21B vs. UFCS (1.34B). UFCS has less debt than HIG: UFCS (146M) vs HIG (4.37B). HIG has higher revenues than UFCS: HIG (28.9B) vs UFCS (1.43B).
HIGUFCSHIG / UFCS
Capitalization36.9B1.36B2,707%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.34147.303-1%
P/E Ratio9.409.8496%
Revenue28.9B1.43B2,027%
Total Cash21B1.34B1,571%
Total Debt4.37B146M2,996%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HIG vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
HIG
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
323
SMR RATING
1..100
4859
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7535
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UFCS's Valuation (40) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HIG (44) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to HIG’s over the last 12 months.

HIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (23) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

HIG's SMR Rating (48) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HIG (58) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to HIG’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIG (75) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HIGUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HIG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UFCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XLSR66.050.27
+0.42%
State Street® US Sector Rotation ETF
BASAX21.380.07
+0.33%
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Adv
SBMAX34.860.11
+0.32%
ClearBridge Mid Cap A
FCVCX19.31N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value C
FWOAX21.34N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership A

HIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIG has been closely correlated with TRV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIG jumps, then TRV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIG
1D Price
Change %
HIG100%
-0.74%
TRV - HIG
88%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
L - HIG
86%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
CINF - HIG
84%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
ALL - HIG
81%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
THG - HIG
81%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with DGICA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then DGICA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
-0.47%
DGICA - UFCS
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HIG - UFCS
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
SAFT - UFCS
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
CINF - UFCS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
THG - UFCS
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
More