HIVE
Price
$1.84
Change
+$0.01 (+0.55%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
311.67M
LAZ
Price
$42.54
Change
-$0.46 (-1.07%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
3.66B
74 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HIVE vs LAZ

Header iconHIVE vs LAZ Comparison
Open Charts HIVE vs LAZBanner chart's image
HIVE Digital Technologies
Price$1.84
Change+$0.01 (+0.55%)
Volume$12.02M
Capitalization311.67M
Lazard
Price$42.54
Change-$0.46 (-1.07%)
Volume$807.48K
Capitalization3.66B
HIVE vs LAZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
HIVE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HIVE vs. LAZ commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIVE is a Buy and LAZ is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (HIVE: $1.84 vs. LAZ: $42.54)
Brand notoriety: HIVE and LAZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HIVE: 148% vs. LAZ: 58%
Market capitalization -- HIVE: $311.67M vs. LAZ: $3.66B
HIVE [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $311.67M. LAZ’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HIVE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLAZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HIVE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LAZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAZ is a better buy in the long-term than HIVE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HIVE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HIVE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LAZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIVE is a better buy in the short-term than LAZ.

Price Growth

HIVE (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.79% price change this week, while LAZ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

HIVE is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2023.

LAZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.53% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAZ($3.66B) has a higher market cap than HIVE($312M). LAZ has higher P/E ratio than HIVE: LAZ (16.44) vs HIVE (6.72). LAZ YTD gains are higher at: -15.562 vs. HIVE (-35.439). LAZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 40.9M vs. HIVE (29.1M). LAZ has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. HIVE (24.7M). HIVE has less debt than LAZ: HIVE (32.9M) vs LAZ (2.18B). LAZ has higher revenues than HIVE: LAZ (2.55B) vs HIVE (121M).
HIVELAZHIVE / LAZ
Capitalization312M3.66B9%
EBITDA29.1M40.9M71%
Gain YTD-35.439-15.562228%
P/E Ratio6.7216.4441%
Revenue121M2.55B5%
Total Cash24.7M1.19B2%
Total Debt32.9M2.18B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HIVE vs LAZ: Fundamental Ratings
HIVE
LAZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3414
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9343
SMR RATING
1..100
8937
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9996
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAZ's Valuation (31) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HIVE (59) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to HIVE’s over the last 12 months.

LAZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIVE (93) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that LAZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIVE’s over the last 12 months.

LAZ's SMR Rating (37) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIVE (89) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that LAZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIVE’s over the last 12 months.

LAZ's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HIVE (63) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to HIVE’s over the last 12 months.

LAZ's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HIVE (99) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to HIVE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HIVELAZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HIVE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTISX11.280.07
+0.62%
Russell Inv Multifactor Intl Eq S
CDHRX32.710.20
+0.62%
Calvert International Responsible Idx R6
VTIAX34.900.21
+0.61%
Vanguard Total Intl Stock Index Admiral
ABVAX16.610.02
+0.12%
AB Large Cap Value A
LAMAX22.36-0.01
-0.04%
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth A

LAZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAZ has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAZ jumps, then MC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAZ
1D Price
Change %
LAZ100%
-1.07%
MC - LAZ
83%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
PIPR - LAZ
81%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
GS - LAZ
79%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
SF - LAZ
79%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
HLI - LAZ
78%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
More