Advertisement
LAZ vs PIPR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Lazard, Inc. (LAZ) vs. Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both LAZ and PIPR operate in the financial services sector, benefiting from rebounding mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity, but PIPR has shown stronger short-term momentum with an 18% gain over the recent 30 days.
- LAZ reported assets under management (AUM) of approximately $259.2 billion as of March 31, 2026, reflecting resilient inflows amid market shifts.
- Year-to-date (YTD), PIPR outperforms LAZ with a 5.33% gain compared to 1.54%.
- Both stocks trade at similar price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios around 22, suggesting comparable valuations in the current market.
- Analyst price targets indicate modest upside: $52.38 for LAZ and $94.88 for PIPR.
- Tickeron's comparison tool rates LAZ as a better long-term buy relative to PIPR.
Introduction
Investors and traders analyzing boutique financial firms often compare LAZ and PIPR, two players in investment banking and advisory services. Both have navigated volatile markets driven by shifting interest rates and M&A cycles, offering exposure to dealmaking recovery and asset management trends. This comparison highlights their recent performance, business drivers, and relative positioning, aiding decisions on sector allocation or momentum trades. With upcoming first-quarter earnings on May 1, 2026, for both, traders eye potential catalysts in a landscape favoring resilient financial intermediaries.
LAZ Overview and Recent Performance
LAZ, a global financial advisory and asset management firm, provides M&A advice, capital raising, and portfolio management across regions. In recent market activity, its stock has exhibited volatility, with a monthly gain of about 16% amid broader financial sector strength, though pulling back from peaks near $58. Key influences include steady AUM growth to $259.2 billion by March end, supported by net inflows despite market fluctuations. Sentiment reflects anticipation for Q1 earnings, where growth is expected, tempered by mixed technical signals like RSI exiting overbought territory and bearish long-term moving average crossovers. Analyst views remain cautious, with a Sell rating from Goldman Sachs, yet average targets suggest upside potential.
PIPR Overview and Recent Performance
PIPR, an investment bank focused on middle-market M&A, public finance, and equity research, serves diverse industries with tailored advisory. Recent weeks have driven strong performance, with shares up 18% over the past 30 days, rebounding from quarterly lows and approaching the 52-week high of $95. This momentum stems from heightened deal activity and positive analyst updates, including price target raises. YTD gains of 5.33% outpace peers, bolstered by solid Q4 results. However, overbought signals like RSI shifts and Stochastic turns introduce caution, alongside a long-term bearish 50-day moving average below the 200-day. Earnings anticipation on May 1 adds near-term focus, with average targets pointing to further gains.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from 351 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend following, momentum, and mean reversion over timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days, delivering real-time signals with risk controls such as 3% take-profit and 2% stop-loss. Standouts boast annualized returns up to 170%, win rates from 48% to 88% (averaging 60-65%), profit factors to 6.94, and focus on sectors like semiconductors and energy. While varying in style and performance stats, they adapt to current conditions, helping traders automate decisions. Explore these bots to identify alignments with financial sector plays like LAZ or PIPR.
Head-to-Head Comparison
LAZ offers broader diversification through substantial AUM, contrasting PIPR's emphasis on middle-market investment banking. Growth drivers differ: LAZ leverages asset inflows and global advisory, while PIPR capitalizes on U.S.-focused M&A and financing upticks. Recent momentum favors PIPR's sharper rebound, but LAZ shows steadier trend consistency per AI signals. Risk factors include cyclical deal flows for both, with LAZ exposed to asset volatility and PIPR to equity underwriting swings. Sector exposure aligns in finance, yet PIPR's higher YTD returns reflect stronger market sentiment amid recovery. Trade-offs pit LAZ's scale against PIPR's agility in niche deals.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI analysis favors LAZ over PIPR for long-term positioning, citing superior trend stability and valuation metrics despite PIPR's recent outperformance. Observable factors like consistent AUM growth and bullish short-term crossovers for LAZ suggest higher probability of sustained upside, particularly post-earnings, though both carry sector risks.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAZ is a Hold and PIPR is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LAZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LAZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LAZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIPR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LAZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PIPR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LAZ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.93% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
LAZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
PIPR is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.25% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| LAZ | PIPR | LAZ / PIPR | |
| Capitalization | 4.3B | 5.41B | 79% |
| EBITDA | 485M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.360 | -1.632 | 512% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.32 | 20.62 | 84% |
| Revenue | 3.26B | 1.95B | 167% |
| Total Cash | 1.23B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.16B | 112M | 1,929% |
LAZ | PIPR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LAZ's Valuation (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (16) in the null industry. This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
PIPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAZ (82) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAZ’s over the last 12 months.
LAZ's SMR Rating (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (41) in the null industry. This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
PIPR's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as LAZ (54) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.
LAZ's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (61) in the null industry. This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
| LAZ | PIPR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 70% | 8 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 71% | 23 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 58% |
Advertisement
LAZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAZ has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAZ jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LAZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAZ | 100% | -1.47% | ||
| EVR - LAZ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| MC - LAZ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| RJF - LAZ | 75% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| PIPR - LAZ | 69% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| IBKR - LAZ | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
More | ||||