Advertisement
HKSHF vs SHCO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKSHF is a Buy and SHCO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HKSHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHCO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HKSHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SHCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HKSHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHCO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HKSHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SHCO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HKSHF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +17.97% price change this week, while SHCO (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -4.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
SHCO is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+0.80% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| HKSHF | SHCO | HKSHF / SHCO | |
| Capitalization | 1.47B | 1.11B | 133% |
| EBITDA | 877M | 89.3M | 982% |
| Gain YTD | -6.136 | -12.215 | 50% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.62 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.86B | 1.14B | 340% |
| Total Cash | 657M | 163M | 403% |
| Total Debt | 16.6B | 2.31B | 718% |
HKSHF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HKSHF | SHCO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 19% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 25 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 18% | 2 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
HKSHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HKSHF and SHCO have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKSHF and SHCO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HKSHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKSHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SHCO - HKSHF | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.24% | ||
| DLTTF - HKSHF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACRFF - HKSHF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACCYY - HKSHF | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.68% | ||
| MNOIY - HKSHF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SHCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHCO has been loosely correlated with H. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHCO jumps, then H could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHCO | 100% | +1.24% | ||
| H - SHCO | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.28% | ||
| HLT - SHCO | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.27% | ||
| MAR - SHCO | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.28% | ||
| IHG - SHCO | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| WH - SHCO | 37% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
More | ||||