HKVTY
Price
$6.55
Change
-$0.31 (-4.52%)
Updated
Jan 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.52B
HRNNF
Price
$29.67
Change
-$0.33 (-1.10%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
17.73B
Ad is loading...

HKVTY vs HRNNF

Header iconHKVTY vs HRNNF Comparison
Open Charts HKVTY vs HRNNFBanner chart's image
HK Electric Investments and HK Electric Investments
Price$6.55
Change-$0.31 (-4.52%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.52B
Hydro One
Price$29.67
Change-$0.33 (-1.10%)
Volume$576
Capitalization17.73B
HKVTY vs HRNNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HKVTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKVTY vs. HRNNF commentary
Jan 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKVTY is a Hold and HRNNF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2025
Stock price -- (HKVTY: $6.55 vs. HRNNF: $29.67)
Brand notoriety: HKVTY and HRNNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKVTY: 28% vs. HRNNF: 6%
Market capitalization -- HKVTY: $5.52B vs. HRNNF: $17.73B
HKVTY [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $5.52B. HRNNF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $17.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKVTY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHRNNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HKVTY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HRNNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKVTY is a better buy in the long-term than HRNNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKVTY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRNNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKVTY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HRNNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HRNNF is a better buy in the short-term than HKVTY.

Price Growth

HKVTY (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HRNNF (@Electric Utilities) price change was -3.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.76% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRNNF($17.7B) has a higher market cap than HKVTY($5.52B). HRNNF has higher P/E ratio than HKVTY: HRNNF (22.16) vs HKVTY (13.05). HRNNF YTD gains are higher at: -2.941 vs. HKVTY (-4.519). HKVTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8B vs. HRNNF (2.57B). HKVTY has more cash in the bank: 279M vs. HRNNF (31M). HRNNF has less debt than HKVTY: HRNNF (14.5B) vs HKVTY (52.1B). HKVTY has higher revenues than HRNNF: HKVTY (11.1B) vs HRNNF (7.58B).
HKVTYHRNNFHKVTY / HRNNF
Capitalization5.52B17.7B31%
EBITDA8B2.57B311%
Gain YTD-4.519-2.941154%
P/E Ratio13.0522.1659%
Revenue11.1B7.58B146%
Total Cash279M31M900%
Total Debt52.1B14.5B359%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HRNNF: Fundamental Ratings
HRNNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
71
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKVTYHRNNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HKVTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VEXAX145.281.57
+1.09%
Vanguard Extended Market Index Admiral
JOEIX11.170.10
+0.90%
JOHCM Emerging Markets Opps Advisor
PEMYX14.030.11
+0.79%
Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Y
TPYIX7.940.06
+0.76%
Touchstone Sands Capital Intl Gr Eq I
IHOAX18.030.10
+0.56%
Hartford International Opportunities A

HKVTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKVTY and HPIFY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKVTY and HPIFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKVTY
1D Price
Change %
HKVTY100%
N/A
HPIFY - HKVTY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRNNF - HKVTY
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
IESFY - HKVTY
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
IBDRY - HKVTY
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
HGKGF - HKVTY
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
More

HRNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRNNF has been loosely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRNNF jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRNNF
1D Price
Change %
HRNNF100%
-1.10%
FTS - HRNNF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
BIP - HRNNF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
ACLLF - HRNNF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
CDUAF - HRNNF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
ENLAY - HRNNF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
More