HKXCY
Price
$44.57
Change
-$0.42 (-0.93%)
Updated
Mar 31 closing price
Capitalization
52.98B
21 days until earnings call
TIGR
Price
$8.68
Change
+$0.09 (+1.05%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
Capitalization
533.37M
56 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HKXCY vs TIGR

Header iconHKXCY vs TIGR Comparison
Open Charts HKXCY vs TIGRBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$44.57
Change-$0.42 (-0.93%)
Volume$85.51K
Capitalization52.98B
UP Fintech Holding
Price$8.68
Change+$0.09 (+1.05%)
Volume$4.44M
Capitalization533.37M
HKXCY vs TIGR Comparison Chart
Loading...
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKXCY vs. TIGR commentary
Apr 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCY is a Hold and TIGR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 02, 2025
Stock price -- (HKXCY: $44.57 vs. TIGR: $8.59)
Brand notoriety: HKXCY and TIGR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCY: 27% vs. TIGR: 81%
Market capitalization -- HKXCY: $52.98B vs. TIGR: $533.37M
HKXCY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $52.98B. TIGR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $533.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTIGR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TIGR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCY is a better buy in the long-term than TIGR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIGR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKXCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TIGR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TIGR is a better buy in the short-term than HKXCY.

Price Growth

HKXCY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.58% price change this week, while TIGR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -2.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +143.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

HKXCY is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

TIGR is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.48% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCY($53B) has a higher market cap than TIGR($533M). HKXCY has higher P/E ratio than TIGR: HKXCY (37.74) vs TIGR (15.40). TIGR YTD gains are higher at: 32.972 vs. HKXCY (22.109). HKXCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2B vs. TIGR (69.1M). HKXCY has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. TIGR (678M). TIGR has less debt than HKXCY: TIGR (166M) vs HKXCY (1.76B). HKXCY has higher revenues than TIGR: HKXCY (16.4B) vs TIGR (252M).
HKXCYTIGRHKXCY / TIGR
Capitalization53B533M9,944%
EBITDA16.2B69.1M23,444%
Gain YTD22.10932.97267%
P/E Ratio37.7415.40245%
Revenue16.4B252M6,508%
Total Cash265B678M39,086%
Total Debt1.76B166M1,061%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCY vs TIGR: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCY
TIGR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5179
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6182
SMR RATING
1..100
781
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1412
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TIGR's Valuation (67) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HKXCY (89) in the null industry. This means that TIGR’s stock grew similarly to HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as TIGR (82) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TIGR (81) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCY’s stock grew significantly faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

TIGR's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HKXCY (40) in the null industry. This means that TIGR’s stock grew similarly to HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

TIGR's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HKXCY (14) in the null industry. This means that TIGR’s stock grew similarly to HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCYTIGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCMAX59.130.21
+0.36%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity A
RYPAX44.99N/A
N/A
Rydex Transportation H
MELIX14.24N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst EMkts Ldrs I
FOPCX18.52N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Intl Sm Cap Opps C
PRCNX10.49N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Intl Disciplined Eq Inv

HKXCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCY has been loosely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCY jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCY
1D Price
Change %
HKXCY100%
-0.93%
FUTU - HKXCY
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
TIGR - HKXCY
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
HKXCF - HKXCY
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
TOP - HKXCY
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.88%
MQBKY - HKXCY
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
More