Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLFMX vs RNWHX
HLFMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts HLFMX vs RNWHX
HLFMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLFMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. HLFMX (118M). HLFMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: HLFMX (3.51) vs RNWHX (1.15). HLFMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: HLFMX (18 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). HLFMX (1.41) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. HLFMX (29.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFMX: RNWHX (250) vs HLFMX (100000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.92 vs. HLFMX (12.34). HLFMX return over 5 years is better than : 20.01 vs. RNWHX (14.48).
| HLFMX | RNWHX | HLFMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.72 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.72 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.583 | 14.413 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 1.15 | 306% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.34 | 21.92 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.19 | 50.69 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.01 | 14.48 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.14 | 123.05 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers