Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLFZX vs RNWBX
HLFZX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLFZX vs RNWBX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg MktsInstZ
Price$9.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.55M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.96
Change-$0.29 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
HLFZX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLFZX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFZX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. HLFZX (131M). HLFZX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLFZX (1.72) vs RNWBX (0.12). HLFZX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLFZX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HLFZX (1.35). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLFZX (16.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFZX: RNWBX (250) vs HLFZX (2500000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.48 vs. HLFZX (10.16). HLFZX return over 5 years is better than : 37.50 vs. RNWBX (25.41).
| HLFZX | RNWBX | HLFZX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.107 | 23.671 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 250 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131M | 75.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 0.12 | 1,431% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.16 | 11.48 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.78 | 54.43 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.50 | 25.41 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement