Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLFZX vs RNWBX
HLFZX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLFZX vs RNWBX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg MktsInstZ
Price$9.12
Change-$0.08 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.25M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.43
Change-$0.39 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
HLFZX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLFZX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFZX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. HLFZX (140M). HLFZX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLFZX (1.77) vs RNWBX (0.13). HLFZX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLFZX (8 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HLFZX (1.35). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLFZX (16.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFZX: RNWBX (250) vs HLFZX (2500000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.05 vs. HLFZX (10.16). HLFZX return over 5 years is better than : 40.62 vs. RNWBX (19.08).
| HLFZX | RNWBX | HLFZX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.232 | 17.512 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 250 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140M | 71.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 0.13 | 1,370% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.16 | 11.05 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.45 | 34.86 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.62 | 19.08 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers