Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLFZX vs RNWBX
HLFZX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLFZX vs RNWBX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg MktsInstZ
Price$9.04
Change-$0.05 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets129.94M
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.26
Change-$1.13 (-1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.04B
HLFZX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLFZX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFZX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74B vs. HLFZX (130M). HLFZX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLFZX (1.70) vs RNWBX (0.12). HLFZX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLFZX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HLFZX (1.35). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLFZX (16.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFZX: RNWBX (250) vs HLFZX (2500000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.30 vs. HLFZX (12.76). HLFZX return over 5 years is better than : 27.23 vs. RNWBX (14.44).
| HLFZX | RNWBX | HLFZX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.483 | 21.360 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 250 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130M | 74B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 0.12 | 1,446% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.76 | 16.30 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.38 | 42.18 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.23 | 14.44 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers