Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLFZX vs RNWBX
HLFZX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLFZX vs RNWBX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg MktsInstZ
Price$8.85
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.6M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.83
Change+$0.12 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.07B
HLFZX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLFZX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFZX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. HLFZX (135M). HLFZX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLFZX (1.80) vs RNWBX (0.13). HLFZX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLFZX (8 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HLFZX (1.35). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLFZX (16.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFZX: RNWBX (250) vs HLFZX (2500000). HLFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.68 vs. RNWBX (8.48). HLFZX return over 5 years is better than : 43.19 vs. RNWBX (24.16).
| HLFZX | RNWBX | HLFZX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.112 | 15.337 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 250 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135M | 70.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.13 | 1,409% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.68 | 8.48 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.54 | 38.04 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.19 | 24.16 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement