Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLFZX vs RNWBX
HLFZX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLFZX vs RNWBX
HLFZX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLFZX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFZX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. HLFZX (121M). HLFZX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLFZX (3.50) vs RNWBX (0.41). HLFZX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLFZX (9 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than HLFZX (1.33). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. HLFZX (29.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFZX: RNWBX (250) vs HLFZX (2500000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.14 vs. HLFZX (12.08). HLFZX return over 5 years is better than : 25.70 vs. RNWBX (9.30).
| HLFZX | RNWBX | HLFZX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.66 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.66 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.077 | 12.082 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 250 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 121M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 0.41 | 848% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.08 | 18.14 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.30 | 39.22 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.70 | 9.30 | 276% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement