Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLFZX vs RNWBX
HLFZX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLFZX vs RNWBX
HLFZX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLFZX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFZX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. HLFZX (117M). HLFZX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLFZX (3.58) vs RNWBX (0.41). HLFZX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLFZX (9 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than HLFZX (1.33). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. HLFZX (29.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFZX: RNWBX (250) vs HLFZX (2500000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.07 vs. HLFZX (13.34). HLFZX return over 5 years is better than : 20.96 vs. RNWBX (14.29).
| HLFZX | RNWBX | HLFZX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.66 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.66 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.320 | 16.252 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 250 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 85.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.58 | 0.41 | 866% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.34 | 28.07 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.67 | 51.49 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.96 | 14.29 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement