Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLGZX vs NPFCX
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLGZX vs NPFCX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$37.39
Change+$0.09 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets578.75M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$67.07
Change+$0.07 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.97B
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLGZX vs. NPFCX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLGZX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. HLGZX (579M). HLGZX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLGZX (0.46) vs NPFCX (0.00). HLGZX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLGZX (8 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than HLGZX (0.77). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: NPFCX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.50 vs. HLGZX (-11.95). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.60 vs. HLGZX (-12.44).
| HLGZX | NPFCX | HLGZX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.48 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.48 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.997 | 15.838 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 579M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.95 | 15.50 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.07 | 39.89 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.44 | 33.60 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement