Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLGZX vs NPFCX
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLGZX vs NPFCX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$38.01
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets586.05M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$68.92
Change+$0.14 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.14B
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLGZX vs. NPFCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLGZX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. HLGZX (586M). HLGZX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLGZX (0.45) vs NPFCX (0.00). HLGZX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLGZX (8 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than HLGZX (0.77). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: NPFCX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.50 vs. HLGZX (-13.92). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.22 vs. HLGZX (-11.09).
| HLGZX | NPFCX | HLGZX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.48 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.48 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.091 | 19.033 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 586M | 164B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.92 | 13.50 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.66 | 54.14 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.09 | 35.22 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.47 | - |