Ad is loading...
HLGZX vs NPFCX
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLGZX vs NPFCX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$33.34
Change+$0.70 (+2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.61M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$56.83
Change+$1.08 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLGZX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLGZX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. HLGZX (510M). HLGZX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLGZX (0.49) vs NPFCX (0.00). HLGZX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLGZX (8 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than HLGZX (0.77). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: NPFCX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.21 vs. HLGZX (-18.61). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.75 vs. HLGZX (-2.63).
| HLGZX | NPFCX | HLGZX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.48 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.48 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.745 | -1.848 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.61 | 3.21 | -579% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.76 | 9.15 | -107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.63 | 41.75 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...