Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLGZX vs NPFCX
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLGZX vs NPFCX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$35.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets557.46M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$62.48
Change-$0.24 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.71B
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLGZX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLGZX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. HLGZX (557M). HLGZX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLGZX (0.47) vs NPFCX (0.00). HLGZX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLGZX (8 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than HLGZX (0.77). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: NPFCX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.14 vs. HLGZX (-14.85). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.84 vs. HLGZX (-8.65).
| HLGZX | NPFCX | HLGZX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.48 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.48 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.308 | 8.325 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 557M | 151B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.85 | 8.14 | -182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.58 | 26.55 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.65 | 37.84 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement