Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLGZX vs NPFCX
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLGZX vs NPFCX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$36.72
Change-$0.11 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets572.84M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$66.18
Change-$0.33 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.04B
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLGZX vs. NPFCX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLGZX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. HLGZX (573M). HLGZX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLGZX (0.46) vs NPFCX (0.00). HLGZX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLGZX (8 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than HLGZX (0.77). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: NPFCX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.72 vs. HLGZX (-15.31). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.84 vs. HLGZX (-14.34).
| HLGZX | NPFCX | HLGZX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.48 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.48 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.287 | 14.301 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 573M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.31 | 10.72 | -143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.54 | 34.15 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.34 | 29.84 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.83 | - |