Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLGZX vs NPFCX
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLGZX vs NPFCX
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLGZX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLGZX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. HLGZX (541M). HLGZX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLGZX (0.59) vs NPFCX (0.33). HLGZX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLGZX (9 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than HLGZX (0.79). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: NPFCX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. HLGZX (-8.99). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.52 vs. HLGZX (-36.34).
| HLGZX | NPFCX | HLGZX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.47 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.47 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.032 | 4.931 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 541M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.33 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.99 | 6.26 | -144% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.56 | 30.32 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.34 | 8.52 | -427% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement