Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLGZX vs NPFCX
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLGZX vs NPFCX
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLGZX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLGZX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. HLGZX (535M). HLGZX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLGZX (0.58) vs NPFCX (0.33). HLGZX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLGZX (9 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than HLGZX (0.79). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: NPFCX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. HLGZX (-6.12). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.16 vs. HLGZX (-34.98).
| HLGZX | NPFCX | HLGZX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.47 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.47 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.299 | 6.075 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 535M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.33 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.12 | 12.12 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.81 | 37.44 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.98 | 11.16 | -313% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement