Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLGZX vs NPFCX
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLGZX vs NPFCX
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLGZX vs. NPFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLGZX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. HLGZX (353M). HLGZX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLGZX (0.57) vs NPFCX (0.33). HLGZX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLGZX (9 years) vs NPFCX (26 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than HLGZX (0.79). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: NPFCX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.83 vs. HLGZX (-9.58). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.04 vs. HLGZX (-36.66).
| HLGZX | NPFCX | HLGZX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.47 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.47 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.038 | 6.030 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.33 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.58 | 2.83 | -339% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.60 | 35.62 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.66 | 6.04 | -607% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement