Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLGZX vs RNPFX
HLGZX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts HLGZX vs RNPFX
HLGZX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLGZX vs. RNPFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLGZX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. HLGZX (530M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than HLGZX: RNPFX (1.21) vs HLGZX (0.59). HLGZX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: HLGZX (9 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). HLGZX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: RNPFX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. HLGZX (-10.12). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.76 vs. HLGZX (-36.04).
| HLGZX | RNPFX | HLGZX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.45 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.45 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.127 | 5.075 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 530M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 1.21 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.12 | 7.04 | -144% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.48 | 34.96 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.04 | 13.76 | -262% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement