Advertisement
HLLY vs SMP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLLY is a Buy and SMP is a Buy.
HLLY | SMP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SMP's Valuation (5) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLLY (54) in the null industry. This means that SMP’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLLY’s over the last 12 months.
SMP's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as HLLY (100) in the null industry. This means that SMP’s stock grew similarly to HLLY’s over the last 12 months.
SMP's SMR Rating (78) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as HLLY (88) in the null industry. This means that SMP’s stock grew similarly to HLLY’s over the last 12 months.
SMP's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as HLLY (73) in the null industry. This means that SMP’s stock grew similarly to HLLY’s over the last 12 months.
HLLY's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMP (76) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that HLLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMP’s over the last 12 months.
| HLLY | SMP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 46% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HLLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HLLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SMP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
Price Growth
HLLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.76% price change this week, while SMP (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +2.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.40%.
Reported Earning Dates
HLLY is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
SMP is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-2.61% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PBPH | 28.82 | 0.03 | +0.10% |
| Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH) | |||
| CEW | 19.56 | -0.03 | -0.16% |
| WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund (CEW) | |||
| IWD | 250.05 | -1.88 | -0.75% |
| iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) | |||
| STXK | 36.12 | -0.46 | -1.27% |
| Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) | |||
| WOOD | 68.29 | -1.03 | -1.48% |
| iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) | |||
HLLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLLY has been loosely correlated with XPEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLLY jumps, then XPEL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLLY | 100% | -2.02% | ||
| XPEL - HLLY | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| ALV - HLLY | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| SMP - HLLY | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| MLR - HLLY | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ADNT - HLLY | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.01% | ||
More | ||||
SMP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMP has been loosely correlated with DORM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMP jumps, then DORM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMP | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| DORM - SMP | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| PHIN - SMP | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| ALV - SMP | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| LEA - SMP | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| DCH - SMP | 48% Loosely correlated | -6.41% | ||
More | ||||