HLLY
Price
$2.55
Change
-$0.03 (-1.16%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
306.94M
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MPAA
Price
$15.09
Change
+$0.14 (+0.94%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
285.58M
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLLY vs MPAA

Header iconHLLY vs MPAA Comparison
Open Charts HLLY vs MPAABanner chart's image
HLLY vs MPAA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLLY vs. MPAA commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLLY is a Hold and MPAA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (HLLY: $2.55 vs. MPAA: $15.09)
Brand notoriety: HLLY and MPAA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLLY: 55% vs. MPAA: 183%
Market capitalization -- HLLY: $306.94M vs. MPAA: $285.58M
HLLY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $306.94M. MPAA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $285.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $75.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMPAA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HLLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MPAA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPAA is a better buy in the long-term than HLLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPAA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MPAA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MPAA is a better buy in the short-term than HLLY.

Price Growth

HLLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while MPAA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +42.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLLY is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

MPAA is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.43% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLLY($307M) has a higher market cap than MPAA($286M). MPAA has higher P/E ratio than HLLY: MPAA (24.34) vs HLLY (12.75). MPAA YTD gains are higher at: 22.285 vs. HLLY (-38.257). HLLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 109M vs. MPAA (68.1M). HLLY has more cash in the bank: 33.1M vs. MPAA (19.6M). MPAA has less debt than HLLY: MPAA (196M) vs HLLY (544M). MPAA has higher revenues than HLLY: MPAA (771M) vs HLLY (608M).
HLLYMPAAHLLY / MPAA
Capitalization307M286M107%
EBITDA109M68.1M160%
Gain YTD-38.25722.285-172%
P/E Ratio12.7524.3452%
Revenue608M771M79%
Total Cash33.1M19.6M169%
Total Debt544M196M278%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPAA: Fundamental Ratings
MPAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
44
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLLYMPAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MPAA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADKSX39.110.43
+1.11%
Adirondack Small Cap
NSCCX44.030.42
+0.96%
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps C
FIGRX63.800.39
+0.62%
Fidelity International Discovery
NCTWX29.000.13
+0.45%
Nicholas II I
NGDCX30.460.04
+0.13%
Neuberger Large Cap Growth C

HLLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLLY has been loosely correlated with SMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLLY jumps, then SMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLLY
1D Price
Change %
HLLY100%
-1.16%
SMP - HLLY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
XPEL - HLLY
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
PLOW - HLLY
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
ADNT - HLLY
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
THRM - HLLY
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
More

MPAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MPAA and ALV have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPAA and ALV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPAA
1D Price
Change %
MPAA100%
+0.94%
ALV - MPAA
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
LEA - MPAA
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
SMP - MPAA
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
MLR - MPAA
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
DAN - MPAA
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.32%
More