Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMGX vs NPFCX
HLMGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLMGX vs NPFCX
HLMGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMGX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. HLMGX (530M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: NPFCX (0.33) vs HLMGX (0.26). HLMGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLMGX (30 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than HLMGX (1.09). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: NPFCX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.55 vs. HLMGX (-10.63). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.57 vs. HLMGX (-37.29).
| HLMGX | NPFCX | HLMGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.47 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.47 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.884 | 4.473 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 530M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.33 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.63 | 5.55 | -191% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.71 | 29.60 | -40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.29 | 7.57 | -493% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.52 | 93.90 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement