Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMGX vs RNPAX
HLMGX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts HLMGX vs RNPAX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Advisor
Price$36.52
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets573.28M
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$65.50
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
HLMGX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMGX vs. RNPAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMGX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. HLMGX (573M). HLMGX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: HLMGX (0.14) vs RNPAX (0.00). HLMGX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: HLMGX (29 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than HLMGX (1.08). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: RNPAX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.41 vs. HLMGX (-14.34). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.31 vs. HLMGX (-14.89).
| HLMGX | RNPAX | HLMGX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.49 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.49 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.497 | 14.852 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 573M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.34 | 12.41 | -116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.23 | 31.33 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.89 | 32.31 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.89 | 77.12 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement