Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMGX vs RNPAX
HLMGX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts HLMGX vs RNPAX
HLMGX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMGX vs. RNPAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMGX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. HLMGX (530M). RNPAX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: RNPAX (0.37) vs HLMGX (0.26). HLMGX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: HLMGX (30 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than HLMGX (1.09). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: RNPAX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.41 vs. HLMGX (-10.63). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.09 vs. HLMGX (-37.29).
| HLMGX | RNPAX | HLMGX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.49 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.49 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.884 | 4.455 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 530M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.37 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.63 | 5.41 | -197% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.71 | 29.24 | -40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.29 | 7.09 | -526% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.52 | 92.75 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement