Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMGX vs RNPAX
HLMGX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts HLMGX vs RNPAX
HLMGX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMGX vs. RNPAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMGX is a Hold and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. HLMGX (532M). RNPAX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: RNPAX (0.36) vs HLMGX (0.25). HLMGX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: HLMGX (30 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than HLMGX (1.09). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: RNPAX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.98 vs. HLMGX (-6.65). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.66 vs. HLMGX (-36.24).
| HLMGX | RNPAX | HLMGX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.49 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.49 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.113 | 6.070 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 532M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.36 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.65 | 11.98 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.03 | 37.06 | -24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.24 | 10.66 | -340% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.57 | 109.78 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement