Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMGX vs RNPFX
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMGX vs RNPFX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Advisor
Price$35.35
Change-$0.50 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets555.08M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$67.50
Change-$0.81 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMGX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMGX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. HLMGX (555M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: RNPFX (0.77) vs HLMGX (0.15). HLMGX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: HLMGX (29 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). HLMGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: RNPFX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. HLMGX (-15.50). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.60 vs. HLMGX (-7.19).
| HLMGX | RNPFX | HLMGX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.46 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.46 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.021 | 8.801 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 555M | 151B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.77 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.50 | 9.22 | -168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.87 | 43.84 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.19 | 49.60 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.68 | 78.80 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement