Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMGX vs RNPFX
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMGX vs RNPFX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Advisor
Price$36.52
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets573.28M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMGX vs. RNPFX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMGX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. HLMGX (573M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: RNPFX (0.74) vs HLMGX (0.14). HLMGX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: HLMGX (29 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). HLMGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: RNPFX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.98 vs. HLMGX (-14.34). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.70 vs. HLMGX (-14.89).
| HLMGX | RNPFX | HLMGX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.46 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.46 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.497 | 15.587 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 573M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.74 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.34 | 13.98 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.23 | 35.34 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.89 | 39.70 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.89 | 89.56 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement