Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMGX vs RNPFX
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMGX vs RNPFX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Advisor
Price$36.71
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets573.69M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$72.71
Change-$0.69 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.17B
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMGX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMGX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. HLMGX (574M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: RNPFX (0.72) vs HLMGX (0.15). HLMGX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: HLMGX (29 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). HLMGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: RNPFX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.90 vs. HLMGX (-16.48). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.38 vs. HLMGX (-13.31).
| HLMGX | RNPFX | HLMGX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.46 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.46 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.329 | 17.199 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 574M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.72 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.48 | 11.90 | -138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.13 | 61.98 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.31 | 41.38 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.27 | 112.09 | 24% |