Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMGX vs RNPFX
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMGX vs RNPFX
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMGX vs. RNPFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMGX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. HLMGX (530M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: RNPFX (1.21) vs HLMGX (0.26). HLMGX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: HLMGX (30 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). HLMGX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: RNPFX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. HLMGX (-10.63). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.76 vs. HLMGX (-37.29).
| HLMGX | RNPFX | HLMGX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.45 | 242% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.45 | 242% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.884 | 5.075 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 530M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.21 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.63 | 7.04 | -151% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.71 | 34.96 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.29 | 13.76 | -271% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.52 | 108.85 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers