Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMGX vs RNPFX
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMGX vs RNPFX
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMGX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMGX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. HLMGX (532M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: RNPFX (1.18) vs HLMGX (0.25). HLMGX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: HLMGX (30 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). HLMGX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: RNPFX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.73 vs. HLMGX (-6.65). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.55 vs. HLMGX (-36.24).
| HLMGX | RNPFX | HLMGX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.45 | 242% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.45 | 242% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.113 | 6.578 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 532M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.18 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.65 | 13.73 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.03 | 43.12 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.24 | 17.55 | -206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.57 | 127.31 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement