Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMGX vs RNPFX
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMGX vs RNPFX
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMGX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMGX is a StrongBuy and RNPFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. HLMGX (353M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: RNPFX (1.18) vs HLMGX (0.25). HLMGX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: HLMGX (30 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). HLMGX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: RNPFX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.30 vs. HLMGX (-10.05). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.12 vs. HLMGX (-37.89).
| HLMGX | RNPFX | HLMGX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.45 | 242% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.45 | 242% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.780 | 6.762 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.18 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.05 | 4.30 | -234% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.89 | 41.21 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.89 | 12.12 | -313% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.18 | 113.42 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement