Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMVX vs NPFCX
HLMVX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs NPFCX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Inst
Price$36.55
Change+$0.40 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets568.22M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$64.59
Change+$0.43 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.98B
HLMVX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. HLMVX (568M). HLMVX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLMVX (0.32) vs NPFCX (0.00). HLMVX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLMVX (16 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than HLMVX (0.87). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: NPFCX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.56 vs. HLMVX (-14.38). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.01 vs. HLMVX (-5.48).
| HLMVX | NPFCX | HLMVX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.48 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.48 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.849 | 11.554 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 568M | 155B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.38 | 10.56 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.10 | 40.81 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.48 | 45.01 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.67 | 74.95 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement