Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMVX vs NPFCX
HLMVX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs NPFCX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Inst
Price$37.33
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets580.22M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$68.05
Change-$0.19 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
HLMVX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. NPFCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. HLMVX (580M). HLMVX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLMVX (0.31) vs NPFCX (0.00). HLMVX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLMVX (16 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than HLMVX (0.87). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: NPFCX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.62 vs. HLMVX (-14.15). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.67 vs. HLMVX (-11.71).
| HLMVX | NPFCX | HLMVX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.48 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.48 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.209 | 17.530 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 580M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.15 | 13.62 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.73 | 48.39 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.71 | 33.67 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.71 | 91.95 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement