Ad is loading...
HLMVX vs NPFCX
HLMVX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs NPFCX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Inst
Price$32.36
Change-$1.08 (-3.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets522.07M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$55.04
Change-$2.29 (-3.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
HLMVX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. HLMVX (522M). HLMVX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLMVX (0.34) vs NPFCX (0.00). HLMVX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLMVX (15 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than HLMVX (0.86). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: NPFCX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.31 vs. HLMVX (-18.60). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 62.26 vs. HLMVX (11.21).
| HLMVX | NPFCX | HLMVX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.48 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.48 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.534 | -0.984 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 522M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.60 | 1.31 | -1,422% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.37 | 0.31 | -5,355% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.21 | 62.26 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.03 | 54.49 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers