Ad is loading...
HLMVX vs NPFCX
HLMVX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs NPFCX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Inst
Price$33.31
Change+$0.70 (+2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.61M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$56.83
Change+$1.08 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
HLMVX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. HLMVX (510M). HLMVX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLMVX (0.34) vs NPFCX (0.00). HLMVX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLMVX (15 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than HLMVX (0.86). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: NPFCX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.21 vs. HLMVX (-18.71). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.75 vs. HLMVX (-3.07).
| HLMVX | NPFCX | HLMVX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.48 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.48 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.777 | -1.848 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.71 | 3.21 | -582% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.03 | 9.15 | -110% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.07 | 41.75 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.20 | 48.98 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...