Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMVX vs NPFCX
HLMVX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs NPFCX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Inst
Price$36.68
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets570.51M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$66.37
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.54B
HLMVX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. NPFCX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. HLMVX (571M). HLMVX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLMVX (0.31) vs NPFCX (0.00). HLMVX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLMVX (16 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than HLMVX (0.87). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: NPFCX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.89 vs. HLMVX (-15.41). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. HLMVX (-17.37).
| HLMVX | NPFCX | HLMVX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.48 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.48 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.144 | 14.629 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 571M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.41 | 10.89 | -141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.41 | 39.15 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.37 | 26.38 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.93 | 85.43 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement