Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMVX vs NPFCX
HLMVX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs NPFCX
HLMVX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. HLMVX (548M). HLMVX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLMVX (0.51) vs NPFCX (0.33). HLMVX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLMVX (17 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than HLMVX (0.88). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: NPFCX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.77 vs. HLMVX (-5.19). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 13.27 vs. HLMVX (-32.63).
| HLMVX | NPFCX | HLMVX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.47 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.47 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.728 | 7.037 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 548M | 164B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.33 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.19 | 12.77 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.76 | 40.04 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.63 | 13.27 | -246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.28 | 103.06 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement