Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMVX vs NPFCX
HLMVX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs NPFCX
HLMVX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. HLMVX (541M). HLMVX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLMVX (0.51) vs NPFCX (0.33). HLMVX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLMVX (17 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than HLMVX (0.88). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: NPFCX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. HLMVX (-9.07). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.52 vs. HLMVX (-36.64).
| HLMVX | NPFCX | HLMVX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.47 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.47 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.006 | 4.931 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 541M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.33 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.07 | 6.26 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.86 | 30.32 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.64 | 8.52 | -430% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.81 | 96.35 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement