Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMVX vs RNPFX
HLMVX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs RNPFX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Inst
Price$38.04
Change+$0.26 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets581.93M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.73
Change+$0.35 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.52B
HLMVX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. RNPFX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. HLMVX (582M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than HLMVX: RNPFX (0.69) vs HLMVX (0.30). HLMVX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: HLMVX (16 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). HLMVX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: RNPFX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.47 vs. HLMVX (-14.62). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.33 vs. HLMVX (-18.44).
| HLMVX | RNPFX | HLMVX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.46 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.46 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.246 | 20.455 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 582M | 164B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.69 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.62 | 14.47 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.62 | 51.43 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.44 | 28.33 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.56 | 95.37 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement