Ad is loading...
HLMVX vs RNPFX
HLMVX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs RNPFX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Inst
Price$33.31
Change+$0.70 (+2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.61M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$61.09
Change+$1.17 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
HLMVX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. RNPFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. HLMVX (510M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than HLMVX: RNPFX (0.84) vs HLMVX (0.34). HLMVX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: HLMVX (15 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). HLMVX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: RNPFX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. HLMVX (-18.71). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.11 vs. HLMVX (-3.07).
| HLMVX | RNPFX | HLMVX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.46 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.46 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.777 | -1.531 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.84 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.71 | 4.59 | -408% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.03 | 12.22 | -82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.07 | 49.11 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.20 | 58.70 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...