Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMVX vs RNPFX
HLMVX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs RNPFX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Inst
Price$37.33
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets580.22M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$73.44
Change-$0.20 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
HLMVX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. HLMVX (580M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than HLMVX: RNPFX (0.72) vs HLMVX (0.31). HLMVX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: HLMVX (16 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). HLMVX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: RNPFX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.12 vs. HLMVX (-14.15). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.56 vs. HLMVX (-11.71).
| HLMVX | RNPFX | HLMVX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.46 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.46 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.209 | 18.375 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 580M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.72 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.15 | 15.12 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.73 | 52.55 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.71 | 40.56 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.71 | 104.45 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement