Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMVX vs RNPFX
HLMVX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs RNPFX
HLMVX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. RNPFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. HLMVX (530M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than HLMVX: RNPFX (1.21) vs HLMVX (0.51). HLMVX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: HLMVX (17 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). HLMVX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: RNPFX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. HLMVX (-10.22). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.76 vs. HLMVX (-36.34).
| HLMVX | RNPFX | HLMVX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.45 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.45 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.102 | 5.075 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 530M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.21 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.22 | 7.04 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.78 | 34.96 | -31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.34 | 13.76 | -264% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.18 | 108.85 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement