HLNE
Price
$162.70
Change
+$4.08 (+2.57%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
4.5B
13 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$18.54
Change
+$0.45 (+2.49%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
8.65B
83 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HLNE vs OWL

Header iconHLNE vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts HLNE vs OWLBanner chart's image
Hamilton Lane
Price$162.70
Change+$4.08 (+2.57%)
Volume$337.59K
Capitalization4.5B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$18.54
Change+$0.45 (+2.49%)
Volume$4.83M
Capitalization8.65B
HLNE vs OWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
HLNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLNE vs. OWL commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLNE is a StrongBuy and OWL is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (HLNE: $162.70 vs. OWL: $18.54)
Brand notoriety: HLNE and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLNE: 62% vs. OWL: 51%
Market capitalization -- HLNE: $4.5B vs. OWL: $8.65B
HLNE [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.5B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLNE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HLNE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLNE is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLNE’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLNE’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLNE is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

HLNE (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.55% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +26.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLNE is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.36% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($8.65B) has a higher market cap than HLNE($4.5B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than HLNE: OWL (185.70) vs HLNE (34.22). HLNE YTD gains are higher at: 10.284 vs. OWL (-19.694). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 633M vs. HLNE (271M). HLNE has more cash in the bank: 164M vs. OWL (104M). HLNE has less debt than OWL: HLNE (277M) vs OWL (2B). OWL has higher revenues than HLNE: OWL (1.73B) vs HLNE (490M).
HLNEOWLHLNE / OWL
Capitalization4.5B8.65B52%
EBITDA271M633M43%
Gain YTD10.284-19.694-52%
P/E Ratio34.22185.7018%
Revenue490M1.73B28%
Total Cash164M104M158%
Total Debt277M2B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLNE: Fundamental Ratings
HLNE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
20
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25
SMR RATING
1..100
25
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLNEOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HLNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLU181.181.62
+0.90%
SPDR® S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
APUE34.310.18
+0.54%
ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF
REAI19.050.01
+0.08%
Intelligent Real Estate ETF
XRMI17.880.01
+0.05%
Global X S&P 500® Risk Managed Inc ETF
BMN23.90-0.11
-0.46%
BlackRock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+2.49%
ARES - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
KKR - OWL
82%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
APO - OWL
82%
Closely correlated
+2.98%
CG - OWL
79%
Closely correlated
+3.28%
BX - OWL
78%
Closely correlated
+2.70%
More