HLNE
Price
$76.39
Change
-$1.70 (-2.18%)
Updated
Jun 11, 12:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.41B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OWL
Price
$9.46
Change
-$0.02 (-0.21%)
Updated
Jun 11, 12:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.4B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLNE vs OWL

Header iconHLNE vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts HLNE vs OWLBanner chart's image
HLNE vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLNE vs. OWL commentary
Jun 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLNE is a Hold and OWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 11, 2026
Stock price -- (HLNE: $78.09 vs. OWL: $9.47)
Brand notoriety: HLNE and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLNE: 99% vs. OWL: 74%
Market capitalization -- HLNE: $3.41B vs. OWL: $6.4B
HLNE [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.41B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $6.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $156.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $8.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLNE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HLNE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLNE is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLNE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLNE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLNE is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

HLNE (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.39% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLNE is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.21% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($6.4B) has a higher market cap than HLNE($3.41B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than HLNE: OWL (78.92) vs HLNE (13.19). OWL YTD gains are higher at: -33.835 vs. HLNE (-41.546). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 951M vs. HLNE (488M). HLNE has more cash in the bank: 364M vs. OWL (190M). HLNE has less debt than OWL: HLNE (356M) vs OWL (4.36B). OWL has higher revenues than HLNE: OWL (2.94B) vs HLNE (759M).
HLNEOWLHLNE / OWL
Capitalization3.41B6.4B53%
EBITDA488M951M51%
Gain YTD-41.546-33.835123%
P/E Ratio13.1978.9217%
Revenue759M2.94B26%
Total Cash364M190M192%
Total Debt356M4.36B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLNE: Fundamental Ratings
HLNE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLNEOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLNE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSV.X2.1504490.162187
+8.16%
ssv.network cryptocurrency
DIA.X0.1224470.001541
+1.27%
DIA cryptocurrency
XCNY32.51N/A
N/A
State Street® SPDR® S&P EM ex-China ETF
HOOK.X0.006002-0.000003
-0.05%
Hooked Protocol cryptocurrency
CFX.X0.043343-0.001332
-2.98%
Conflux cryptocurrency

HLNE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLNE has been closely correlated with STEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLNE jumps, then STEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLNE
1D Price
Change %
HLNE100%
-2.39%
STEP - HLNE
74%
Closely correlated
-1.60%
BX - HLNE
68%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
KKR - HLNE
67%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
TPG - HLNE
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.27%
ARES - HLNE
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
-1.25%
ARES - OWL
78%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
BX - OWL
73%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
TPG - OWL
73%
Closely correlated
-3.27%
KKR - OWL
72%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
APO - OWL
71%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
More