Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLRZX vs MIDCX
HLRZX vs MIDCX Comparison
Open Charts HLRZX vs MIDCX
HLRZX vs MIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDCX has more cash in the bank: 7.55B vs. HLRZX (169M). HLRZX pays higher dividends than MIDCX: HLRZX (1.46) vs MIDCX (0.65). HLRZX was incepted earlier than MIDCX: HLRZX (3 years) vs MIDCX (26 years). MIDCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HLRZX (1.00). HLRZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. MIDCX (17.00). MIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLRZX: MIDCX (1000) vs HLRZX (5000000). MIDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.79 vs. HLRZX (-0.96).
| HLRZX | MIDCX | HLRZX / MIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.03 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.04 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.632 | 5.386 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 7.55B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.65 | 227% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.96 | 4.79 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.66 | 14.10 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -9.53 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement