Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLSCX vs RWMFX
HLSCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HLSCX vs RWMFX
HLSCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLSCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLSCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HLSCX (2.98B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HLSCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs HLSCX (0.06). HLSCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HLSCX (6 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). HLSCX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). HLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). HLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: HLSCX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. HLSCX (-2.29). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. HLSCX (10.82).
| HLSCX | RWMFX | HLSCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.31 | 355% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.31 | 355% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.354 | 4.508 | -97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.98B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.41 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.29 | 2.09 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.03 | 30.24 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.82 | 27.39 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers