It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
HLT (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а +3.61% price change this week, while MAR (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was +2.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.89%.
HLT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
MAR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.
HLT | MAR | HLT / MAR | |
Capitalization | 63.6B | 72.4B | 88% |
EBITDA | 2.62B | 4.42B | 59% |
Gain YTD | 9.506 | -3.981 | -239% |
P/E Ratio | 41.59 | 30.02 | 139% |
Revenue | 11.5B | 25.4B | 45% |
Total Cash | 371M | 523M | 71% |
Total Debt | 11.7B | 15.9B | 74% |
HLT | MAR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 3 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLT's Valuation (78) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (91). This means that HLT’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.
HLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (22). This means that HLT’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.
HLT's SMR Rating (3) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (5). This means that HLT’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.
HLT's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (56). This means that HLT’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.
MAR's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLT (60). This means that MAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLT’s over the last 12 months.
HLT | MAR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 1 day ago54% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago54% | 5 days ago54% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago87% | 1 day ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago62% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TPIF | 33.01 | -0.05 | -0.15% |
Timothy Plan International ETF | |||
VCR | 382.00 | -0.67 | -0.18% |
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | |||
SDVD | 21.45 | -0.20 | -0.92% |
FT Vest SMID Ris Div Ach Trg IncETF | |||
SPCY | 29.60 | -0.29 | -0.97% |
STKd 100% SMCI & 100% NVDA ETF | |||
UMDD | 24.26 | -0.94 | -3.75% |
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLT has been closely correlated with MAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLT jumps, then MAR could also see price increases.