HMC
Price
$26.11
Change
-$0.60 (-2.25%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
34.9B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TM
Price
$172.03
Change
-$3.75 (-2.13%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
228.78B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMC vs TM

Header iconHMC vs TM Comparison
Open Charts HMC vs TMBanner chart's image
HMC vs TM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Honda Motor Co. (HMC) vs. Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • HMC trades around $24.51 with a market cap of $31.8 billion, showing YTD returns of about 17% but down from 52-week high of $34.89 amid EV strategy challenges.
  • TM is priced near $187.53 with a $222 billion market cap, YTD up roughly 13% yet facing profit pressures from U.S. tariffs, with a 52-week range of $167.18–$248.90.
  • Both stocks exhibit low beta (HMC 0.27–0.44, TM 0.33), PE ratios around 10 (HMC 10.26, TM 9.94), and attractive dividend yields, appealing for value-oriented investors in the auto sector.
  • Recent market activity reflects tariff impacts and cost pressures, with TM reporting 19–21.5% net income drops despite strong sales, while HMC deals with EV impairments.
  • TM demonstrates greater scale and hybrid strength, while HMC offers diversification via motorcycles and power products.
  • Tickeron's AI analysis leans toward TM for relative stability and momentum in recent trends.

Introduction

Honda Motor Co. (HMC) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) are leading Japanese automakers competing in global markets for vehicles, hybrids, and emerging electrification. This stock comparison evaluates their recent performance, financial metrics, and market positioning amid U.S. tariffs, supply chain pressures, and shifting consumer demand toward hybrids. Traders seeking value in the cyclical auto sector and long-term investors eyeing dividend stability will find insights into relative strengths, risks, and AI-driven perspectives on which may offer better positioning in the current environment.

HMC Overview and Recent Performance

Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) engages in motorcycles, automobiles, financial services, and power products worldwide. In recent market activity, shares have traded around $24.51, up 1.87% in the latest session but down significantly from the 52-week high of $34.89, reflecting broader auto sector headwinds. Year-to-date returns stand at approximately 17%, with a trailing PE of 10.26 and market cap of $31.8 billion. Sentiment has been influenced by EV strategy revisions, including impairments on North American models and the end of the Afeela project with Sony, alongside weaker U.S. sales in April (down 0.2% to 137,405 units). Q3 FY2026 showed record unit sales but auto losses due to EV expenses and tariffs, maintaining a full-year operating profit forecast of ¥550 billion. A low beta of 0.27 underscores stability, bolstered by a 5.82% dividend yield.

TM Overview and Recent Performance

Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) designs, manufactures, and sells vehicles, batteries, and financial services globally under Toyota and Lexus brands. Shares recently closed at $187.53, down 0.78% amid earnings reactions, within a 52-week range of $167.18–$248.90 and a market cap of $222 billion. YTD performance is around 13%, with a PE of 9.94 (TTM EPS $18.87). Recent weeks have seen pressure from FY2026 results: 19% net income decline to ¥3.85 trillion despite ¥50.68 trillion revenue and 9.6 million unit sales, driven by U.S. tariffs (¥1.38 trillion operating profit hit, 21.5% drop) and costs. Q4 profit missed estimates by a wide margin (49% slump), with conservative FY2027 guidance. Hybrid demand and share buybacks provide support, with beta at 0.33 indicating resilience.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots, powered by AI and machine learning, adapt to current market conditions with diverse strategies like trend analysis, multi-agent systems, and take-profit/stop-loss corridors on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days. Featured bots target growth sectors such as semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, AMD), industrials, small caps, leveraged ETFs, space infrastructure, data centers, volatility plays, gold miners, and finance, posting annualized returns from +23% to +285%, win rates of 51–88%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Top performers include a space bot at +285% annualized (72% win rate) and semiconductor-focused ones at +96–+168%. Explore these for potential edges in volatile markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both HMC and TM operate in the competitive auto sector, emphasizing hybrids amid slowing EV adoption, but differ in scale and diversification. TM's larger business model drives higher revenue (¥50.68T TTM vs. HMC's ¥21.34T) and global sales leadership, with growth from hybrids and hydrogen tech offsetting tariff risks estimated at $9 billion. HMC counters with motorcycles (strong profits) and power products, reducing auto reliance. Recent momentum favors neither decisively, with both YTD positive but off highs due to U.S. sales softness and costs; TM shows better 3-year returns (~38–44%). Risks include tariffs and USMCA uncertainty for affordable models, though TM's hybrid exposure bolsters sentiment. Sector-wise, both benefit from Japan auto resilience but face China EV competition.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors TM over HMC, based on superior scale, consistent hybrid-driven trend stability, larger market cap positioning, and relative momentum despite tariff headwinds. Observable factors like higher revenue base, buyback activity, and broader growth catalysts suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term, though HMC's diversification tempers downside risk.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
HMC vs. TM commentary
Jun 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMC is a StrongBuy and TM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 11, 2026
Stock price -- (HMC: $26.11 vs. TM: $172.03)
Brand notoriety: HMC and TM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMC: 94% vs. TM: 103%
Market capitalization -- HMC: $34.9B vs. TM: $228.78B
HMC [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $34.9B. TM’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $228.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.43T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $66.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HMC is a better buy in the long-term than TM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HMC is a better buy in the short-term than TM.

Price Growth

HMC (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -5.77% price change this week, while TM (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -4.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -8.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -23.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

HMC is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

TM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-8.13% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TM($229B) has a higher market cap than HMC($34.9B). HMC has higher P/E ratio than TM: HMC (10.24) vs TM (9.34). HMC YTD gains are higher at: -11.431 vs. TM (-19.635). TM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.63T vs. HMC (1.77T). TM has more cash in the bank: 16.64T vs. HMC (5.04T). TM has higher revenues than HMC: TM (50.69T) vs HMC (21.34T).
HMCTMHMC / TM
Capitalization34.9B229B15%
EBITDA1.77T7.63T23%
Gain YTD-11.431-19.63558%
P/E Ratio10.249.34110%
Revenue21.34T50.69T42%
Total Cash5.04T16.64T30%
Total DebtN/A43.21T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMC vs TM: Fundamental Ratings
HMC
TM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3953
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10078
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5472
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1829
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TM's Valuation (10) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as HMC (17). This means that TM’s stock grew similarly to HMC’s over the last 12 months.

TM's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as HMC (100). This means that TM’s stock grew similarly to HMC’s over the last 12 months.

TM's SMR Rating (100) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as HMC (100). This means that TM’s stock grew similarly to HMC’s over the last 12 months.

HMC's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as TM (72). This means that HMC’s stock grew similarly to TM’s over the last 12 months.

HMC's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as TM (29). This means that HMC’s stock grew similarly to TM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMCTM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERAS13.37-0.04
-0.30%
Erasca
BBDC8.36-0.10
-1.18%
Barings BDC
HEI320.88-5.54
-1.70%
HEICO Corp
CVGI4.94-0.22
-4.26%
Commercial Vehicle Group
SURG0.46-0.04
-8.30%
SurgePays

HMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMC has been closely correlated with TM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HMC jumps, then TM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMC
1D Price
Change %
HMC100%
-2.25%
TM - HMC
79%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
GM - HMC
43%
Loosely correlated
-5.21%
F - HMC
39%
Loosely correlated
-4.35%
STLA - HMC
30%
Poorly correlated
-6.68%
BLBD - HMC
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.44%
More

TM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TM has been closely correlated with HMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TM jumps, then HMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TM
1D Price
Change %
TM100%
-2.13%
HMC - TM
73%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
GM - TM
44%
Loosely correlated
-5.21%
F - TM
38%
Loosely correlated
-4.35%
STLA - TM
35%
Loosely correlated
-6.68%
RACE - TM
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.07%
More